IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Pedagogical Promise and Peril of AI: A Text Mining Analysis of ChatGPT Research Discussions in Programming Education

Pedagogical Promise and Peril of AI: A Text Mining Analysis of ChatGPT Research Discussions in Programming Education
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Juvy C. Grume (Pampanga State University, Philippines), John Paul P. Miranda (Pampanga State University, Philippines), Aileen P. De Leon (Pampanga State University, Philippines), Jordan L. Salenga (Pampanga State University, Philippines), Hilene E. Hernandez (Pampanga State University, Philippines), Mark Anthony A. Castro (Pampanga State University, Philippines), Vernon Grace M. Maniago (Pampanga State University, Philippines), Joel D. Canlas (Pampanga State University, Philippines)and Joel B. Quiambao (Pampanga State University, Philippines)
Copyright: 2026
Pages: 26
Source title: Pedagogical Innovations in Computer Science Education
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Manuel B. Garcia (FEU Institute of Technology, Philippines)
DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3373-6546-6.ch010

Purchase


Abstract

GenAI systems such as ChatGPT are increasingly discussed in programming education, but the ways in which the research literature conceptualizes and frames their role remain unclear. This chapter applies text mining to publications indexed in a leading academic database to map scholarly discourse on ChatGPT in programming education. Term frequency analysis, phrase pattern extraction, and topic modeling reveal four dominant themes: pedagogical implementation, student-centered learning and engagement, AI infrastructure and human–AI collaboration, and assessment, prompting, and model evaluation. The literature prioritizes classroom practice and learner interaction, with comparatively limited attention to assessment design and institutional governance. Across studies, ChatGPT is positioned both as a learning aid that supports explanation, feedback, and efficiency and as a pedagogical risk linked to overreliance, unreliable outputs, and academic integrity concerns. These findings support responsible integration and highlight the need for stronger assessment and governance mechanisms.

Related Content

Wan Zuhainis Saad, Nor Aziah Alias, Chou Min Chong, Suriana Sabri. © 2026. 26 pages.
V. Krishnamoorthy, Nishant Bhuvanesh Trivedi, Ratan Sarkar, Ranjeeta Saini, Archudha Arjunasamy. © 2026. 30 pages.
Prasanna Ramakrisnan, Mohd Farhan Shah Ahmad Rusli, Mike Soon Tai Gan Hou. © 2026. 18 pages.
Rippandeep Kaur, Ratan Sarkar, M. Lalitha, Saurabh Chandra, Taruna Anand. © 2026. 30 pages.
M. Dhanasekar, Rijuta Prashant Joshi, R. Somasundaram, Kavya D. N., Uma Patil, Subhi Boopa. © 2026. 28 pages.
Billur Köfter, Canan Koçak Altundağ, Ayşem Seda Yücel. © 2026. 38 pages.
Nazurah Nik-Eezammuddeen, Najwa Baharudin. © 2026. 34 pages.
Body Bottom