IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Developing a Rubric to Evaluate the Dissertations Conducted in the Fields of Educational and Social Sciences

Developing a Rubric to Evaluate the Dissertations Conducted in the Fields of Educational and Social Sciences
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Ömer Açıkgöz (Social Sciences University of Ankara, Turkey), Aydın Aslan (Selcuk University, Turkey), Korkut Koçak (Republic of Türkiye Ministry of National Education, Turkey), Aslı Günay (Social Sciences University of Ankara, Turkey)and Nevzat Yavuz (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye, Turkey)
Copyright: 2023
Pages: 15
Source title: Improving Learning Through Assessment Rubrics: Student Awareness of What and How They Learn
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Chahna Gonsalves (King's Business School, King's College London, UK)and Jayne Pearson (King's Academy, King's College London, UK)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-6086-3.ch010

Purchase

View Developing a Rubric to Evaluate the Dissertations Conducted in the Fields of Educational and Social Sciences on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

This study aims to develop a rubric to evaluate the dissertations implemented in the fields of educational and social sciences. In the development of this rubric, the acquisition requirements concerning knowledge, skills, and competence at the doctorate level in the European and Turkish qualifications frameworks, the legal framework of Turkish higher education, and the perceptions of 12 experts in the fields of educational and social sciences concerning the common competences of the dissertations were considered. The rubric can contribute to the evaluation of dissertations completed in the field of educational and social sciences concerning these dimensions and provide PhD students, researchers, and academics with a guide to evaluate their academic studies based on an empirical instrument.

Related Content

Shivnath Ghosh, Olivia Jana. © 2026. 40 pages.
Mustafa Kayyali. © 2026. 32 pages.
Sheeba Joseph, Tanuja Khan. © 2026. 26 pages.
Gabriele Strohschen, Kenneth Elazier, Marquis B. Holley, Vincent Wiggins. © 2026. 34 pages.
Lyndon Batiste, Ephranette Brown, Jessie Copeland, Kimberly A. Copenhaver, Margaret W. Ellingson, Kim Norman, Sofia Slutskaya. © 2026. 36 pages.
Philip Christopher, Richard Nero, Lu Aye. © 2026. 30 pages.
Mustafa Kayyali. © 2026. 32 pages.
Body Bottom