IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Impact Assessment of Policies and Practices for Agile Software Process Improvement: An Approach Using Dynamic Simulation Systems and Six Sigma

Impact Assessment of Policies and Practices for Agile Software Process Improvement: An Approach Using Dynamic Simulation Systems and Six Sigma
View Sample PDF
Author(s): George Leal Jamil (InescTec, Portugal)and Rodrigo Almeida de Oliveira (IETEC, Brazil)
Copyright: 2021
Pages: 26
Source title: Research Anthology on Recent Trends, Tools, and Implications of Computer Programming
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Information Resources Management Association (USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-3016-0.ch072

Purchase


Abstract

This chapter proposes the application of computer simulation models for the evaluation of software quality improvement through the implementation of policies and practices of software development processes and performing the measurement of the evolution of the quality through the Six Sigma methodology. In order to provide decision makers of process improvement, a model of dynamic simulation of systems was proposed. Model validation was performed using data collected from various projects developed in an information technology company headquartered in Belo Horizonte-MG. The models mentioned in this chapter are able to provide the decision makers a tooling of process improvement able to perform predictions, predictions, analysis of “what if” scenarios in the model. As a result of this work, a dynamic simulation model of systems capable of performing the evaluation of software quality in Sigma level is found. Also, there are comparisons and analyses of actual data of software development projects with the simulation data of the models presented. The earnings with the new version of the case exceed by more than 50% the Sigma level, the quality of software developed, and reduction of more than 55% of the time of development of the project.

Related Content

Preethi, Sapna R., Mohammed Mujeer Ulla. © 2023. 16 pages.
Srividya P.. © 2023. 12 pages.
Preeti Sahu. © 2023. 15 pages.
Vandana Niranjan. © 2023. 23 pages.
S. Darwin, E. Fantin Irudaya Raj, M. Appadurai, M. Chithambara Thanu. © 2023. 33 pages.
Shankara Murthy H. M., Niranjana Rai, Ramakrishna N. Hegde. © 2023. 23 pages.
Jothimani K., Bhagya Jyothi K. L.. © 2023. 19 pages.
Body Bottom