IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

A Hybrid Fuzzy Multiple Objective Approach to Lotsizing, Pricing, and Marketing Planning Model

A Hybrid Fuzzy Multiple Objective Approach to Lotsizing, Pricing, and Marketing Planning Model
View Sample PDF
Author(s): R. Ghasemy Yaghin (Amirkabir University of Technology, Iran)and S.M.T. Fatemi Ghomi (Amirkabir University of Technology, Iran)
Copyright: 2012
Pages: 19
Source title: Fuzzy Methods for Customer Relationship Management and Marketing: Applications and Classifications
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Andreas Meier (University of Fribourg, Switzerland)and Laurent Donzé (University of Fribourg, Switzerland)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-0095-9.ch012

Purchase

View A Hybrid Fuzzy Multiple Objective Approach to Lotsizing, Pricing, and Marketing Planning Model on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Given high variability of demands, a manufacturer has to decide about the products’ prices and lotsizing from a supplier. Due to imprecise and fuzzy nature of parameters such as unit costs and marketing function, a hybrid fuzzy multi-objective programming model including both quantitative and qualitative objectives is proposed to determine the optimal price, marketing expenditure, and lotsize. Considering pricing, marketing, and lotsizing decisions simultaneously, the model maximizes the profit, return on inventory investment (ROII) (as a financial performance criterion), and total customer satisfaction under general demand function with a time-varying pattern in fuzzy environment. After applying appropriate strategies to defuzzify the original model, the equivalent multi-objective crisp model is then transformed by a fuzzy goal programming method. A soft computing, particle swarm optimization (PSO) is applied to solve the final crisp problem. An industrial case study is provided to show the applicability and usefulness of the proposed model and solution method. Finally, concluding remarks are reported.

Related Content

Aynetu Terefe, Shashi Kant, Metasebia Adula, Tafese Niguse. © 2026. 26 pages.
Tanya, Nitin Pathak, Priyanka Chugh. © 2026. 32 pages.
Nitika Sharma, Paras Sarjolta. © 2026. 18 pages.
Manoj Govindaraj, Ravishankar Krishnan, L. Anitha, G. M. Shaju, Chandramowleeswaran Gnanasekaran, Jenifer Lawrence. © 2026. 30 pages.
Ravishankar Krishnan, Navaneetha Krishnan Rajagopal. © 2026. 28 pages.
Kriti Kishor, Sanjeev Kumar Bansal, Stefano Bresciani. © 2026. 14 pages.
Shashi Kant, Tamire Ashuro, Metasebia Adula. © 2026. 30 pages.
Body Bottom