IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Reification of Five Types of Modeling Pedagogies with Model-Based Inquiry (MBI) Modules for High School Science Classrooms

Reification of Five Types of Modeling Pedagogies with Model-Based Inquiry (MBI) Modules for High School Science Classrooms
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Todd Campbell (University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, USA), Phil Seok Oh (Gyeongin National University of Education, Korea)and Drew Neilson (Logan High School, USA)
Copyright: 2013
Pages: 21
Source title: Approaches and Strategies in Next Generation Science Learning
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Myint Swe Khine (University of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bahrain)and Issa M. Saleh (University of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bahrain)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-2809-0.ch006

Purchase


Abstract

It has been declared that practicing science is aptly described as making, using, testing, and revising models. Modeling has also emerged as an explicit practice in science education reform efforts. This is evidenced as modeling is highlighted as an instructional target in the recently released Conceptual Framework for the New K-12 Science Education Standards: it reads that students should develop more sophisticated models founded on prior knowledge and skills and refined as understanding develops. Reflecting the purpose of engaging students in modeling in science classrooms, Oh and Oh (2011) have suggested five modeling activities, the first three of which were based van Joolingen’s (2004) earlier proposal: 1) exploratory modeling, 2) expressive modeling, 3) experimental modeling, 4) evaluative modeling, and 5) cyclic modeling. This chapter explores how these modeling activities are embedded in high school physics classrooms and how each is juxtaposed as concurrent instructional objectives and scaffolds a progressive learning sequence. Through the close examination of modeling in situ within the science classrooms, the authors expect to better explicate and illuminate the practices outlined and support reform in science education.

Related Content

Vasanthi Reena Williams. © 2023. 13 pages.
Kiran Vazirani, Rameesha Kalra, Sunanda Vincent Jaiwant. © 2023. 17 pages.
Amandeep Singh, Jyoti Verma, Gagandeep Kaur. © 2023. 11 pages.
Ayodeji Ilesanmi. © 2023. 16 pages.
Nidhi Sheoran, Nisha, Kuldeep Chaudhary. © 2023. 23 pages.
Abin George, D. Ravindran, Monika Sirothiya, Mahendar Goli, Nisha Rajan. © 2023. 22 pages.
Deepa Sharma. © 2023. 16 pages.
Body Bottom