The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Quality Assurance in Norwegian Higher Education: A Case Study
Abstract
This chapter starts out by exploring why five higher education institutions failed to meet nationally agreed criteria for the approval of their quality systems. In order to achieve this, the review panels' reports were examined with a particular view to data analysis and data application. The reports were readily available online and represented an excellent data source for research purposes. Panels found that institutional quality reports were descriptive rather than analytical, that quality procedures were unsystematic and conclusions often missing. Unfortunately, the panels failed to come up with radically new approaches that could potentially alter that situation. Rather, the recipe seems to be more of the same, in particular student evaluation of teaching. With this as a backdrop, this study provides conceptual tools that might change the actors' approaches and thus empower those undertaking quality reviews locally. The alternative could otherwise be sustained frustration and wasted efforts.
Related Content
John Robinson, Daniel Beneroso.
© 2022.
19 pages.
|
Klaas Stek.
© 2022.
30 pages.
|
Mira Kekkonen, Ville Isoherranen.
© 2022.
19 pages.
|
Helder Gomes Costa, Frederico Henrichs Sheremetieff, Elaine Aparecida Araújo.
© 2022.
20 pages.
|
Erik Teixeira Lopes, André Luiz Aquere.
© 2022.
30 pages.
|
Ariana Araujo, Heidi Manninen.
© 2022.
27 pages.
|
João Eduardo Teixeira Marinho, Inês Rafaela Martins Freitas, Isabelle Batista dos Santos Leão, Leonor Oliveira Carvalho Sousa Pacheco, Margarida Pires Gonçalves, Maria João Carvalho Castro, Pedro Duarte Marinho Silva, Rafael José Sousa Moreira.
© 2022.
19 pages.
|
|
|