IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Ontological Foundations of Information Systems Analysis and Design: Extending the Scope of the Discussion

Ontological Foundations of Information Systems Analysis and Design: Extending the Scope of the Discussion
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Boris Wyssusek (Queensland University of Technology, Australia)and Helmut Klaus (Queensland University of Technology, Australia)
Copyright: 2005
Pages: 23
Source title: Business Systems Analysis with Ontologies
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Peter F. Green (University of Queensland, Australia)and Michael Rosemann (Queensland University of Technology, Australia)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-339-5.ch012

Purchase

View Ontological Foundations of Information Systems Analysis and Design: Extending the Scope of the Discussion on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Ontology has attracted considerable attention in information systems analysis and design (ISAD) research. Ontology is philosophy and bears its own substance and history of debates, which quite often have not been accounted for in information systems research. A more comprehensive consideration of well-known philosophical issues of ontology may help to apprehend precisely the transfer of ontological concepts into ISAD, including insights regarding their limitations and to articulate directions towards further research. In particular, this requires expanding of the scope of current debates in information systems towards the socio-philosophical aspects of ontology. Only then, it will be possible to determine whether ontology can direct the project of theoretical foundation for ISAD. An outline of the critique of the prevailing rationalistic methodical understanding of information systems development in contemporary IS literature illustrates how the indiscriminating borrowing of philosophical presuppositions has encumbered current understandings. Critical reflection upon these presuppositions can get over persuasions and bring about theorisation.

Related Content

Timilehin Olasoji Olubiyi. © 2025. 24 pages.
Joy Eghonghon Akahome, Sidney Ogodo, Timilehin Olasoji Olubiyi. © 2025. 32 pages.
Nurul Hidayana Mohd Noor. © 2025. 28 pages.
Abdulkadri Toyin Alabi. © 2025. 30 pages.
Pooja Darda, Timilehin Olasoji Olubiyi, Olamide Titilayo Ayodeij, Abiodun Richard Obisanya. © 2025. 18 pages.
Priyanka Indoria, Mohd Danish Chishti, Abdullah Bin Junaid. © 2025. 30 pages.
R. Vettriselvan. © 2025. 24 pages.
Body Bottom