The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Navigating Contradictions Cognitive Dissonance and Narrative Conflicts in Higher Education Crisis Diagnostics
Abstract
This study exposes how cognitive dissonance and narrative conflicts critically undermine crisis diagnostics in higher education. Through systematic literature review and thematic analysis of 170 studies, we demonstrate that psychological discomfort (e.g., leaders rationalizing budget cuts) and competing stakeholder narratives (e.g., administrative “efficiency” vs. faculty “betrayal”) jointly distort threat assessment, causing diagnostic delays, 25% budget overruns, 40% enrollment declines, and prolonged disruptions. An integrated framework counters these barriers via (1) stakeholder alignment workshops to resolve dissonance (35% faster consensus), (2) digital sensemaking protocols co-creating unified narratives (50% faster resolution), and (3) ethical AI governance ensuring transparent, bias-audited analytics (40% trust restoration). The framework transforms crises from collapse points into catalysts for resilient renewal through narrative coherence and accountable governance.
Related Content
|
Janet Acker, Denise Simard.
© 2026.
18 pages.
|
|
Anirban Ghatak, Setavi Purushottam Thoke.
© 2026.
36 pages.
|
|
John Reed.
© 2026.
30 pages.
|
|
John F. Dion.
© 2026.
26 pages.
|
|
Heather Fronckowiak.
© 2026.
22 pages.
|
|
Daniel Nester.
© 2026.
26 pages.
|
|
Jaime Iglehart Frasson.
© 2026.
26 pages.
|
|
|