The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Mapping Metaphors With Generative AI: Collective Perspectives in Higher Education
|
|
Author(s): Carmen Vallis (University of Sydney, Australia), Stephanie Wilson (University of Sydney, Australia), Alison Casey (University of Sydney, Australia), Zoe Alderton (University of Sydney, Australia), Praveena Chandra (University of Sydney, Australia), Tianya Chen (University of Sydney, Australia), Corinna Galliano (University of Sydney, Australia), Jacquelyn Hole (University of Sydney, Australia), Advaith Madhav (University of Sydney, Australia), Joanne Nash (University of Sydney, Australia), Ju Li Ng (University of Sydney, Australia), Benedicte Rokvic (University of Sydney, Australia), Wendy Taleo (Flinders University, Australia), Antony J. H. Tibbs (Edith Cowan University, Australia), Christie van Diggele (University of Sydney, Australia)and Dewa Wardak (University of Sydney, Australia)
Copyright: 2026
Pages: 34
Source title:
Rethinking Education and Agency in the Age of Human-Generative AI Interaction
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Aras Bozkurt (Anadolu University, Turkey)
DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3373-1195-1.ch011
Purchase
|
Abstract
This chapter offers collective, creative, and deeply human insights into the advent of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) from participants in higher education. Building on earlier workshop-based research, contributors were invited to submit written reflections on the metaphors they had collaboratively generated and discussed. Thirteen participants, including academic and professional staff and one student, responded and are included as co-authors. Their reflections, shaped through a cycle of metaphor-driven creation, introspection, and collective reflection, form the basis of a collective writing methodology that foregrounds shared meaning-making and diverse perspectives. This approach is offered as an alternative to the solution-focused responses within the sector to this rapidly changing technology. By designing for play with language and attending to affective dimensions, it opens space to reflect not only on GenAI in educational contexts, but also on a broader moment of transformation for educators, students, and institutions alike.
Related Content
|
Bikash Kumar, Rhythm Gaba, Rabi Shaw.
© 2026.
40 pages.
|
|
R. Velmurugan, J. Sudarvel, R. Bhuvaneswari, Ravi Thirumalaisamy.
© 2026.
28 pages.
|
|
J. Vijaya, Soumya Chandrakar, Pragya Shrivastava.
© 2026.
42 pages.
|
|
Yamini Ghanghorkar, Amruta Deshpande.
© 2026.
28 pages.
|
|
B. Bharathi, B. Kalaivani, Kasu Manaswi, Kantabathina Tejaswini.
© 2026.
28 pages.
|
|
Moumita Chowdhury, Aastha Agarwal, Alisha Parveen, Abhishek Mukhopadhyay.
© 2026.
42 pages.
|
|
Utkarsh Trivedi, Yash Vardhan, Piyush Kumar, Ansh Aryan, Parth Batra, Hitesh Mohapatra.
© 2026.
28 pages.
|
|
|