The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Faculty Perceptions and Participation in Distance Education
|
|
Author(s): Kim E. Dooley (Texas A&M University, USA), James R. Linder (Texas A&M University, USA), Chanda Elbert (Texas A&M University, USA), Timothy H. Murphy (Texas A&M University, USA)and Theresa P. Murphrey (Texas A&M University, USA)
Copyright: 2008
Pages: 5
Source title:
Online and Distance Learning: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Lawrence A. Tomei (Robert Morris University, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-935-9.ch276
Purchase
|
Abstract
Research in the field of distance education has recognized the need for a change and modification of the faculty role in teaching at a distance (Jones, Lindner, Murphy & Dooley, 2002; Kanuka, Collett & Caswell, 2002; Miller & Pilcher, 2001). While technological advancements are an important part of the distance-learning environment, basic changes in teaching methods, technique, and motivation are needed to make distance education more effective (Purdy & Wright, 1992). Many studies cite faculty resistance to instructional technology as a primary barrier to the continued growth of distance education programs (Jones et al., 2002; McNeil, 1990). McNeil (1990) noted that attitudinal issues related to how faculty perceive and interact with technology are a bigger barrier to adoption and diffusion of distance education than is technology infrastructure.
Related Content
|
Sylvia Robertson.
© 2023.
28 pages.
|
|
Dimitrios Stamovlasis, Charalampos Tsanidis.
© 2023.
23 pages.
|
|
Ikram Chelliq, Lamya Anoir, Mohamed Erradi, Mohamed Khaldi.
© 2023.
26 pages.
|
|
Vasiliki Ioakeimidou.
© 2023.
27 pages.
|
|
Eleni Bonti.
© 2023.
25 pages.
|
|
Lamya Anoir, Ikram Chelliq, Mohamed Erradi, Mohamed Khaldi.
© 2023.
29 pages.
|
|
Shibu Puthalath, M. R. Mallaiah, Viswesh Sekhar.
© 2023.
17 pages.
|
|
|