IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Faculty Participation in Online Higher Education: What Factors Motivate or Inhibit Their Participation?

Faculty Participation in Online Higher Education: What Factors Motivate or Inhibit Their Participation?
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Michael S. Hoffman (St. Bonaventure University, USA)
Copyright: 2018
Pages: 14
Source title: Teacher Training and Professional Development: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Information Resources Management Association (USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-5631-2.ch095

Purchase

View Faculty Participation in Online Higher Education: What Factors Motivate or Inhibit Their Participation? on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

In the past decade, enrollments in distance education, and specifically online education, have grown dramatically in the United States. According to the 2009 Sloan Report (), enrollments in online courses increased from 9.6% of total postsecondary enrollments in 2002 to 25.3% in 2009. Unfortunately, a number of barriers exist that may result in an inability of higher education institutions to provide quality online education programming in sufficient scale to meet the expected student demand. The Managing Online Education report () identifies the resistance of faculty towards teaching in an online environment as foremost among ten factors that “impede institutional efforts to expand online education programs” (p. 1). An understanding of the factors that both motivate and discourage faculty member participation in online education programs is critical if institutions are to leverage their existing faculty to meet the current and future demand for online education. This case study first presents a number of motivating and inhibiting factors and then discusses how St. Bonaventure University leveraged these factors in an attempt to boost faculty participation in online education.

Related Content

Julie Uranis, Andréa Rodriguez, Isabel Cardenas-Navia, Karen Elzey, Janet Forte. © 2022. 20 pages.
Michelle Alvarez, Tracey F. W. Osborne, Karen Mayeu, Katie Cullen, Emily Masterson, MaryEllen Stevenson. © 2022. 24 pages.
Josephine Lang, Karyn Giglietta. © 2022. 20 pages.
Kai E. Degner, Sarah K. MacDonald, Melissa M. Lubin. © 2022. 20 pages.
Yi Huang. © 2022. 25 pages.
Stella Porto, Andrea Leonelli, Xenia Coton, Claudia Useche, Pablo Olguin, Victoria Sofia D'Agostino. © 2022. 28 pages.
Shelly R. Rodriguez, Jason Robert Harron, Stephanie Chang, Lauren Penney. © 2022. 21 pages.
Body Bottom