The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Exploring Myths in Digital Forensics: Separating Science From Ritual
Abstract
Digital forensic methodology deviates significantly relative to the methods of other forensic sciences for numerous practical reasons, and it has been largely influenced by factors derived from the inception and evolution of this relatively new and rapidly changing field. Digital forensics methodology was developed more by practitioners in its early days rather than by computer scientists. This led to accepted best practices in the field that may not represent the best or, at least, tested, science. This paper explores some of these differences in the practice and evolution between digital and other forensic sciences, and recommends scientific approaches to apply to many digital forensic practice rituals.
Related Content
|
Vivek Bhardwaj, Bilal Ahmed, Mirza Shuja, Deepak Thakur, Tanya Gera, Mukesh Kumar.
© 2026.
26 pages.
|
|
Vivek Bhardwaj, Tanima Thakur, Mrinalini Rana, Jeyaganesh Viswanathan.
© 2026.
24 pages.
|
|
Abhishek Sharma, Abhishek Mishra, Shweta Jain, Khushboo Karodiya, Priyanka Sharma.
© 2026.
10 pages.
|
|
Akash Mishra, Nandini Bansod, Dinesh Baban Kamble.
© 2026.
18 pages.
|
|
Anjali Rawat, George Kurian, Romil Rawat, Janet Olivia Richmond, Anand Rajavat, Purvee Bhardwaj.
© 2026.
28 pages.
|
|
Antonio Gonzalez-Torres.
© 2026.
26 pages.
|
|
Anjali Rawat, A. Samson Arun Raj, Janet Olivia Richmond, Anand Rajavat, Antonio González-Torres, Purvee Bhardwaj.
© 2026.
22 pages.
|
|
|