The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Workplace Well-Being as a Buzzword: Criticisms Made Toward Future Explorations of the Concept
Abstract
The purpose of the proposed chapter involved a provocation regarding the assumptions about the meaning of workplace well-being. The proposed work included four aspects from which the writers intended to demonstrate the multiple challenges that scholars faced regarding the meaning of well-being: (a) theoretical lenses, (b) philosophical worldviews, (c) degree of mixed methodologies in peer-reviewed literature, and (d) epistemological considerations. The researchers also proposed the following three challenges: (a) an issue existed regarding inconsistency in contemporary organizational responses toward workplace misinterpretations of conflict, (b) a universal agreement did not exist regarding the meaning of workplace well-being, and (c) a significant use of situational leadership models, combined with the other two challenges, perpetuated the reliance on the concept of well-being as a buzzword instead of an actual goal worthy of consideration. Furthermore, solutions to the challenges included organizational forums and epistemological consideration
Related Content
|
Robin Robin, Robert van der Veen.
© 2026.
38 pages.
|
|
Maria Carmela Aprile, Francesco Testa.
© 2026.
28 pages.
|
|
Müzeyyen Gelibolu.
© 2026.
34 pages.
|
|
Liudmyla Bovsh, Ahmed Chemseddine Bouarar, Larysa Hopkalo, Kamel Mouloudj.
© 2026.
24 pages.
|
|
Souad Maghraoui, Lilia Khrouf.
© 2026.
28 pages.
|
|
Yen Teng Cheam, Ponmalar N Alagappar.
© 2026.
32 pages.
|
|
Eeman Almokdad, Kamel Mouloudj.
© 2026.
26 pages.
|
|
|