The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Using Artificial Intelligence to Evaluate the Nature of Science Myths: A Comparison of Pre-Service Science Teachers and ChatGPT
Abstract
This chapter aims to compare the performances of pre-service science teachers (PSTs) and generative artificial intelligence (AI) application (ChatGPT) in answering nature of science (NoS) myths. In this study, which was designed according to a qualitative descriptive research design, the 15 most frequently encountered NoS myths were addressed to 104 PSTs and the ChatGPT. The data were analyzed using content analysis. As a result of the research, when the items related to all myths were analyzed, approximately 48% of the PSTs had myths about the NoS, while 66% of the ChatGPT answers included correct information. Therefore, ChatGPT can be effective in seeking answers to NoS myths. However, since the resources used by ChatGPT are limited to certain books, contents, or resources of certain countries, it may not be efficient enough in terms of providing information diversity. According to these results, comparison of PSTs and ChatGPT's answers are discussed.
Related Content
|
Frederic Andres.
© 2027.
14 pages.
|
|
Kalsoom Safdar, Khairul Najmy Abdul Rani, Mohd Aminudin Jamlos, Siti Julia Rosli, Muhammad Usman Younus, Zanab Safdar.
© 2027.
27 pages.
|
|
Bani Adam, Binastya Anggara Sekti, Muhammad Adi Zacky Zahran.
© 2027.
24 pages.
|
|
Swetha Margaret T. A., Renuka Devi D..
© 2027.
31 pages.
|
|
Maurice Saluschke, Michael Schulz.
© 2027.
30 pages.
|
|
Mirjam Sepesy Maučec, Gregor Donaj.
© 2027.
16 pages.
|
|
Jorge A. Ruiz-Vanoye, Ocotlan Diaz-Parra, Ricardo A. Barrera-Cámara, Alejandro Fuentes-Penna, Francisco R. Trejo-Macotela, Jaime Aguilar-Ortiz, Eric Simancas-Acevedo.
© 2027.
21 pages.
|
|
|