IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Technology and Teacher Education: Student Evaluation of Faculty Instructional Quality

Technology and Teacher Education: Student Evaluation of Faculty Instructional Quality
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Albert Akyeampong (Ohio University, USA), Teresa Franklin (Ohio University, USA)and Jared Keengwe (University of North Dakota, USA)
Copyright: 2012
Pages: 10
Source title: Advancing Education with Information Communication Technologies: Facilitating New Trends
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Lawrence A. Tomei (Robert Morris University, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61350-468-0.ch009

Purchase

View Technology and Teacher Education: Student Evaluation of Faculty Instructional Quality on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

This study explored one primary question: To what extent do student perceptions of various forms of instructional technology tools predict instructional quality? Participants for the study were drawn from a teacher education program in a large Midwest public university. Data were collected using a web-based survey with a total of 121 responses used in the final analysis. A multiple regression analysis was conducted to evaluate how well Productivity Tools, Presentation Tools, Communication Tools, and World Wide Web Tools predict Student Evaluation of Faculty Instructional Quality. The overall significant results of the regression model and the subsequent significant results of the t-test for Presentation Tools and Productivity Tools is an indication that Presentation and Productivity tools can be used by faculty to facilitate student and faculty interaction, promote cooperation among students, promote active learning techniques, give prompt feedback, emphasize time on task, communicate high expectation and respect diverse talents and ways of learning.

Related Content

. © 2025. 20 pages.
. © 2025. 22 pages.
. © 2025. 22 pages.
. © 2025. 22 pages.
. © 2025. 20 pages.
. © 2025. 20 pages.
. © 2025. 20 pages.
Body Bottom