IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Technology Acceptance Model

Technology Acceptance Model
View Sample PDF
Author(s): M. McCord (Central Missouri State University, USA)
Copyright: 2007
Pages: 3
Source title: Handbook of Research on Electronic Surveys and Measurements
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Rodney A. Reynolds (Azusa Pacific University, USA), Robert Woods (Spring Arbor University, USA)and Jason D. Baker (Regent University, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-792-8.ch038

Purchase

View Technology Acceptance Model on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Davis, 1989) measures perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use as predictors of a user’s intent to use computer technology, and their actual usage on the job. The measure first appeared in 1989, in an MIS Quarterly article by Fred Davis and in a coauthored article in Management Science(Davis, 1989; Davis, Bagozzi, & Warshaw, 1989). Extending the Theory of Reasoned Action (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980) to technology, Perceived usefulness (U) is defined as “the degree to which a person believes a particular system would enhance his or her job performance.” Perceived ease of use (EOU) is defined as “the degree to which a person believes that using a particular system would be free of effort.” ‘Usage intentions’ (BI) was measured through self-predicted future usage and ‘user acceptance’ was measured through self-reported current usage. Although information technology is adopted to improve employee performance, these gains are often lost or diminished by users’ unwilling to accept and use the information system. Davis wanted to understand why users rejected or accepted information technologies, to better predict, explain and increase user acceptance. The TAM model has since become one of the most established models for predicting user acceptance.

Related Content

Natwaine Sherune Gardner, Kedon J. S. Luke, Andrew O. Wheatley, Winston De La Haye, Perceval Steven Bahado-Singh, Lowell L. Dilworth, Donovan A. McGrowder, Everard Barton, Lauriann E. Young-Martin, Ajibeke Salako-Akande, Henry Lowe, Errol Morrison, Denise Eldermire-Shearer, Helen Asemota. © 2019. 21 pages.
Alessandro Massaro. © 2019. 25 pages.
Sami D. Alaruri. © 2019. 14 pages.
K. Vinoth Kumar, Prawin Angel Michael. © 2019. 15 pages.
Nitin K. Mandavgade, Santosh B. Jaju, Ramesh R. Lakhe. © 2019. 22 pages.
Madan Kumar Sharma, Mithilesh Kumar Kumar, Satya P. Singh. © 2019. 21 pages.
Andreia de Lima Fioravante, Evelyn de Freitas Guimarães, Fabiano Barbieri Gonzaga, Cristiane Rodrigues Augusto, Claudia Cipriano Ribeiro, Eliane Cristina Pires do Rego, Elaine Batista de Santana, Laura Alves das Neves, Lucas Junqueira de Carvalho, Renato Rubim Ribeiro de Almeida, Rodrigo C. de Sena, Marcelo de Almeida Dominguez, Janaina Marques Rodrigues Caixeiro, Valnei Smarçaro da Cunha, Sidney P. Sobral. © 2019. 20 pages.
Body Bottom