IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Social Constructivism vs. Pragmatism: A Search for a Suitable Social Work Paradigm for Research on Immigrants

Social Constructivism vs. Pragmatism: A Search for a Suitable Social Work Paradigm for Research on Immigrants
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Ziaul Islam Jewel (UNITEC Institute of Technology, New Zealand)
Copyright: 2024
Pages: 15
Source title: Methodologies and Ethics for Social Sciences Research
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Aytekin Demircioğlu (Kastamonu University, Turkey)
DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-1726-6.ch007

Purchase


Abstract

Migration is one of the most significant areas where we can connect social work research, with an estimated 281 million people living outside of their country of birth in 2020. Given the social work profession's commitment to serving marginalised and disadvantaged populations, it must acknowledge the importance of researching immigrants. The primary problem with immigrant studies is that there are no unified paradigms, and this is a subject of ongoing discussion in social work research. However, a number of paradigms, such as constructivism, post-positivism, participatory action frameworks, pragmatism, etc., frame and construct modern social work research. To determine which paradigm is best for researching immigrants, this chapter primarily examines the paradigms of social constructivism and pragmatism. It concludes that social constructivism is the best paradigm for this type of research.

Related Content

Robin Throne, Michalina Hendon. © 2024. 19 pages.
Fatmanur Özen, Aytekin Demircioğlu. © 2024. 22 pages.
Kübra Kırca Demirbaga. © 2024. 17 pages.
Gulcin Karadeniz. © 2024. 15 pages.
Glenn Dawes. © 2024. 20 pages.
Aylin Akinlar. © 2024. 29 pages.
Ziaul Islam Jewel. © 2024. 15 pages.
Body Bottom