IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

The Potential of E-Participation in Sustainable Development Evaluation: Evidence from Case Studies

The Potential of E-Participation in Sustainable Development Evaluation: Evidence from Case Studies
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Patrizia Lombardi (Politecnico di Torino, Italy), Pekka Huovila (VTT Technical Research Centre, Finland)and Minna Sunikka-Blank (University of Cambridge, UK)
Copyright: 2010
Pages: 16
Source title: Politics, Democracy and E-Government: Participation and Service Delivery
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Christopher G. Reddick (University of Texas at San Antonio, USA )
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61520-933-0.ch001

Purchase

View The Potential of E-Participation in Sustainable Development Evaluation: Evidence from Case Studies on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

If sustainable development is really to be based on substantive community participation, a change in attitudes, beliefs and values is required. Even these changes will not be sufficient to reach the ambitious goals set across Europe through the Local Agenda 21 and other policy documents. The rigorous adaptation of decision-making processes to include community participation is necessary. Development and specification of indicators play an important role in bridging this gap. The indicators should not only form a technical input in the latter type of assessment tools but act as media to communicate the progress towards sustainable development to the local communities and other stakeholders. This chapter deals with the issue of e-participation in decision making and sustainable development evaluation. It presents first a critical overview of sustainable development and knowledge society indicators, metrics and assessment tools currently in use. Then, it introduces the role of Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) in urban regeneration processes by using a number of European case studies. Finally, it states the need for a more systematic approach to integrate CSOs earlier in the decision-making process and to ensure a more effective use of sustainable development indicators – with the help of the Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs).

Related Content

Jorge A. Ruiz-Vanoye, Ocotlán Díaz-Parra, Eric Simancas-Acevedo. © 2026. 26 pages.
Ricardo A. Barrera-Cámara, David H. Fuque-Ehuan, Alejandro Fuentes-Penna. © 2026. 36 pages.
Juan Manuel Xicoténcatl-Pérez, Jorge A. Ruiz-Vanoye, Ocotlán Díaz-Parra, José M. Liceaga-Ortiz-De-La-Peña, Julio César Ramos-Fernández, Rubén Oswaldo Hernández-Terrazas. © 2026. 28 pages.
Francisco R. Trejo-Macotela, Jaime Aguilar-Ortiz, Esther Citlali Garcia-Contreras. © 2026. 48 pages.
Francisco R. Trejo-Macotela, Uriel Amado Ramírez-Hernández, Daniel Robles-Camarillo, Edgar López-López. © 2026. 40 pages.
Francisco R. Trejo-Macotela. © 2026. 46 pages.
Mario Oscar Ordaz Oliver, Evelin Gutiérrez, Jesús Patricio Ordaz, Javier Hernández Pérez, Amadeo Manuel Hernández Hernández, Justo Fabián Montiel Hernández. © 2026. 24 pages.
Body Bottom