The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
New Design Paradigm: Shaping and Employment
Abstract
The multiple shortcomings of the current Design paradigm manifest the need of its modification. Our objective was to find out an appropriate mechanism. But such a mechanism could not be revealed without assistance of a Design theory. The emergent dilemma – to use one of the available theories or develop a new one – was resolved by choosing the third way: rearrangement of the material at hand on modularity principles with initiation of fundamental (systemic) Design theory module via identification of its paradigm. While doing this, we had to overcome a number of delusions ingrained in engineering design, concerned firstly with design problem, process and design representation. To push these efforts forward, a scientific base named Continuous Process Theory had been developed. Systemic module initiation enabled to define a paradigm of the second Design theory module – the sought-for Design practice paradigm. Discussion on the outcomes of this definition rounds off this chapter.
Related Content
|
Göran Roos.
© 2026.
28 pages.
|
|
Uzma Abbas, Shalom Akhai, Mahapara Abbass, Sana Abass, Arti Chouksey, Amandeep Singh Wadhwa.
© 2026.
54 pages.
|
|
Rismawati Rismawati, Suaedi Suaedi, Supriadi Supriadi, St. Salmah Sharon, Abdul Haris.
© 2026.
36 pages.
|
|
Dinar Kale, Pallavi Joshi, Stuart Parris.
© 2026.
36 pages.
|
|
Prodromos I. Prodromidis.
© 2026.
38 pages.
|
|
Lefteris Topaloglou, Despoina Kanteler, Yiannis Karagiannis, Dionysios Giannakopoulos, Dimitris Kallioras.
© 2026.
38 pages.
|
|
Jipson Joseph, Achyutananda Mishra.
© 2026.
32 pages.
|
|
|