IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

E-Government in Brazil: Reinforcing Dominant Institutions or Reducing Citizenship?

E-Government in Brazil: Reinforcing Dominant Institutions or Reducing Citizenship?
View Sample PDF
Author(s): José Rodrigues Filho (Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Brazil)
Copyright: 2010
Pages: 16
Source title: Politics, Democracy and E-Government: Participation and Service Delivery
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Christopher G. Reddick (University of Texas at San Antonio, USA )
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61520-933-0.ch021

Purchase

View E-Government in Brazil: Reinforcing Dominant Institutions or Reducing Citizenship? on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Despite the popularity of, and blossoming research on the use of, information and communication technologies (ICTs) in the information society, especially in terms of e-government and e-democracy, little research has been conducted to answer questions related to the effects of ICTs on citizenship, which is said to be at risk. It is claimed that the political science research in modern democracy has narrowed citizenship down to voting, turning democracy into something to be experienced at election time only and not between elections. We need a very clear understanding of the opportunities brought by new technologies and the dangers and risks regarding the realization of citizenship and civil rights. If it is true that ICT has done little to change our democracy, and if it in itself does not guarantee the realization of the rights of the citizens, research work must be developed in order to better analyze the relationship between ICT and citizenship. Because this kind of research is almost non-existent, even in the developed world, this paper attempts to see whether e-government projects in Brazil are designed in ways which reflect our best understanding of freedom, social justice, addressing the sources of inequalities, alienation, and injustice.

Related Content

Jorge A. Ruiz-Vanoye, Ocotlán Díaz-Parra, Eric Simancas-Acevedo. © 2026. 26 pages.
Ricardo A. Barrera-Cámara, David H. Fuque-Ehuan, Alejandro Fuentes-Penna. © 2026. 36 pages.
Juan Manuel Xicoténcatl-Pérez, Jorge A. Ruiz-Vanoye, Ocotlán Díaz-Parra, José M. Liceaga-Ortiz-De-La-Peña, Julio César Ramos-Fernández, Rubén Oswaldo Hernández-Terrazas. © 2026. 28 pages.
Francisco R. Trejo-Macotela, Jaime Aguilar-Ortiz, Esther Citlali Garcia-Contreras. © 2026. 48 pages.
Francisco R. Trejo-Macotela, Uriel Amado Ramírez-Hernández, Daniel Robles-Camarillo, Edgar López-López. © 2026. 40 pages.
Francisco R. Trejo-Macotela. © 2026. 46 pages.
Mario Oscar Ordaz Oliver, Evelin Gutiérrez, Jesús Patricio Ordaz, Javier Hernández Pérez, Amadeo Manuel Hernández Hernández, Justo Fabián Montiel Hernández. © 2026. 24 pages.
Body Bottom