IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Gender Role Inventory

Gender Role Inventory
View Sample PDF
Author(s): J. Weaver (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA)
Copyright: 2007
Pages: 4
Source title: Handbook of Research on Electronic Surveys and Measurements
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Rodney A. Reynolds (Azusa Pacific University, USA), Robert Woods (Spring Arbor University, USA)and Jason D. Baker (Regent University, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-792-8.ch054

Purchase

View Gender Role Inventory on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

We describe a newly developed 14-item inventory designed to measure two dimensions – agency and communion – of gender role self perceptions. The Gender Role Inventory (GRI-14) emerges as a conceptual and empirical refinement of the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI; Bem, 1981) offering exceptional utility for electronic-based research while overcoming questions about construct validity and psychometric adequacy inherent in the BSRI. Since its inception, the BSRI has proven a widely used tool for assessing femininity and masculinity in numerous empirical studies and, to a significant extent, has defined the nature of sex role orientation in the research literature. Despite its popularity, however, persistent questions have arisen over whether the BSRI actually measures what it claims to measure (see, for example, Choi & Fuqua, 2003; Hoffman & Borders, 2001). A highly consistent pattern emerging across a range of factor-analytic studies, for example, is (1) a single femininity factor and two or more complex masculinity factors, (2) a tendency toward inconsistent item loading across these factors (e.g., over half of the femininity subscale items do not load on the femininity factor), and (3) an unexpectedly low amount of total variance typically accounted for by the primary factors. Concerns such as these, some argue, point to an “initial lack of theoretically defined dimensions of masculinity/femininity measured by the BSRI” (Choi & Fuqua, 2003, p. 884) while others proposed that the BSRI actually measures constructs such as instrumentality and expressiveness (e.g., Bohannon & Mills, 1979; Moreland, 1978).

Related Content

Natwaine Sherune Gardner, Kedon J. S. Luke, Andrew O. Wheatley, Winston De La Haye, Perceval Steven Bahado-Singh, Lowell L. Dilworth, Donovan A. McGrowder, Everard Barton, Lauriann E. Young-Martin, Ajibeke Salako-Akande, Henry Lowe, Errol Morrison, Denise Eldermire-Shearer, Helen Asemota. © 2019. 21 pages.
Alessandro Massaro. © 2019. 25 pages.
Sami D. Alaruri. © 2019. 14 pages.
K. Vinoth Kumar, Prawin Angel Michael. © 2019. 15 pages.
Nitin K. Mandavgade, Santosh B. Jaju, Ramesh R. Lakhe. © 2019. 22 pages.
Madan Kumar Sharma, Mithilesh Kumar Kumar, Satya P. Singh. © 2019. 21 pages.
Andreia de Lima Fioravante, Evelyn de Freitas Guimarães, Fabiano Barbieri Gonzaga, Cristiane Rodrigues Augusto, Claudia Cipriano Ribeiro, Eliane Cristina Pires do Rego, Elaine Batista de Santana, Laura Alves das Neves, Lucas Junqueira de Carvalho, Renato Rubim Ribeiro de Almeida, Rodrigo C. de Sena, Marcelo de Almeida Dominguez, Janaina Marques Rodrigues Caixeiro, Valnei Smarçaro da Cunha, Sidney P. Sobral. © 2019. 20 pages.
Body Bottom