The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Equivalence of Electronic and Off-Line Measures
Abstract
This paper explores the measurement equivalence of paper-and pencil and electronic surveys and measures. After reviewing competing claims and the limitations of the research, there is a strong case that many measures do retain their psychometric equivalence across modes of administration with the exception of speeded tests and measures that may be subject to social desirability response sets.
Related Content
|
Natwaine Sherune Gardner, Kedon J. S. Luke, Andrew O. Wheatley, Winston De La Haye, Perceval Steven Bahado-Singh, Lowell L. Dilworth, Donovan A. McGrowder, Everard Barton, Lauriann E. Young-Martin, Ajibeke Salako-Akande, Henry Lowe, Errol Morrison, Denise Eldermire-Shearer, Helen Asemota.
© 2019.
21 pages.
|
|
Alessandro Massaro.
© 2019.
25 pages.
|
|
Sami D. Alaruri.
© 2019.
14 pages.
|
|
K. Vinoth Kumar, Prawin Angel Michael.
© 2019.
15 pages.
|
|
Nitin K. Mandavgade, Santosh B. Jaju, Ramesh R. Lakhe.
© 2019.
22 pages.
|
|
Madan Kumar Sharma, Mithilesh Kumar Kumar, Satya P. Singh.
© 2019.
21 pages.
|
|
Andreia de Lima Fioravante, Evelyn de Freitas Guimarães, Fabiano Barbieri Gonzaga, Cristiane Rodrigues Augusto, Claudia Cipriano Ribeiro, Eliane Cristina Pires do Rego, Elaine Batista de Santana, Laura Alves das Neves, Lucas Junqueira de Carvalho, Renato Rubim Ribeiro de Almeida, Rodrigo C. de Sena, Marcelo de Almeida Dominguez, Janaina Marques Rodrigues Caixeiro, Valnei Smarçaro da Cunha, Sidney P. Sobral.
© 2019.
20 pages.
|
|
|