IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Does Protecting Databases Using Perturbation Techniques Impact Knowledge Discovery?

Does Protecting Databases Using Perturbation Techniques Impact Knowledge Discovery?
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Rick L. Wilson (Oklahoma State University, USA, University of Evansville, USA)
Copyright: 2008
Pages: 10
Source title: Information Security and Ethics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Hamid Nemati (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-937-3.ch242

Purchase

View Does Protecting Databases Using Perturbation Techniques Impact Knowledge Discovery? on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Data perturbation is a data security technique that adds noise in the form of random numbers to numerical database attributes with the goal of maintaining individual record confidentiality. Generalized Additive Data Perturbation (GADP) methods are a family of techniques that preserve key summary information about the data while satisfying security requirements of the database administrator. However, effectiveness of these techniques has only been studied using simple aggregate measures (averages, etc.) found in the database. To compete in today’s business environment, it is critical that organizations utilize data mining approaches to discover information about themselves potentially hidden in their databases. Thus, database administrators are faced with competing objectives: protection of confidential data versus disclosure for data mining applications. This chapter empirically explores whether data protection provided by perturbation techniques adds a so-called Data Mining Bias to the database. While the results of the original study found limited support for this idea, stronger support for the existence of this bias was found in a follow-up study on a larger more realistic-sized database.

Related Content

Chirag Sharma, Amanpreet Kaur, Priyanka Datta, Yonis Gulzar. © 2025. 30 pages.
M. Johnpaul, Raam Sai Bharadwaj Miryala, Marica Mazurek, G. Jayaprakashnarayana, Ramesh Kumar Miryala. © 2025. 28 pages.
Jatin Arora, Gaganpreet Kaur, Monika Sethi, Saravjeet Singh. © 2025. 20 pages.
L. A. Anto Gracious, L. Sudha, B. Chitra, Gaganpreet Kaur, V. Sathya, P. Kabitha, R. Siva Subramanian. © 2025. 28 pages.
Bhavik Singla, Anuj Kumar Jain, Gaganpreet Kaur, Nitin Jain, Vishal Jain. © 2025. 28 pages.
P. Vijayalakshmi, K. Subashini, B. Selvalakshmi, G. Sudhakar, Anand Anbalagan, N. Bharathiraja, Gaganpreet Kaur. © 2025. 22 pages.
Djamel Saba, Abdelkader Hadidi. © 2025. 28 pages.
Body Bottom