IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Detection of Network Attacks With Artificial Immune System

Detection of Network Attacks With Artificial Immune System
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Feyzan Saruhan-Ozdag (Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Turkey), Derya Yiltas-Kaplan (Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Turkey)and Tolga Ensari (Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Turkey)
Copyright: 2020
Pages: 18
Source title: Pattern Recognition Applications in Engineering
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Diego Alexander Tibaduiza Burgos (Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia), Maribel Anaya Vejar (Universidad Sergio Arboleda, Colombia)and Francesc Pozo (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Spain)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-1839-7.ch002

Purchase

View Detection of Network Attacks With Artificial Immune System on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Intrusion detection systems are one of the most important tools used against the threats to network security in ever-evolving network structures. Along with evolving technology, it has become a necessity to design powerful intrusion detection systems and integrate them into network systems. The main purpose of this research is to develop a new method by using different techniques together to increase the attack detection rates. Negative selection algorithm, a type of artificial immune system algorithms, is used and improved at the stage of detector generation. In phase of the preparation of the data, information gain is used as feature selection and principal component analysis is used as dimensionality reduction method. The first method is the random detector generation and the other one is the method developed by combining the information gain, principal component analysis, and genetic algorithm. The methods were tested using the KDD CUP 99 data set. Different performance values are measured, and the results are compared with different machine learning algorithms.

Related Content

Julián Sierra-Pérez, Joham Alvarez-Montoya. © 2020. 40 pages.
Feyzan Saruhan-Ozdag, Derya Yiltas-Kaplan, Tolga Ensari. © 2020. 18 pages.
Leonardo Juan Ramirez Lopez, Gabriel Alberto Puerta Aponte. © 2020. 25 pages.
Jersson X. Leon-Medina, Maribel Anaya Vejar, Diego A. Tibaduiza. © 2020. 25 pages.
Richard Isaac Abuabara, Felipe Díaz-Sánchez, Juliana Arevalo Herrera, Isabel Amigo. © 2020. 22 pages.
Pragathi Penikalapati, A. Nagaraja Rao. © 2020. 19 pages.
Nancy E. Ochoa Guevara, Andres Esteban Puerto Lara, Nelson F. Rosas Jimenez, Wilmar Calderón Torres, Laura M. Grisales García, Ángela M. Sánchez Ramos, Omar R. Moreno Cubides. © 2020. 30 pages.
Body Bottom