IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Bankruptcy Prediction by Supervised Machine Learning Techniques: A Comparative Study

Bankruptcy Prediction by Supervised Machine Learning Techniques: A Comparative Study
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Chih-Fong Tsai (National Central University, Taiwan), Yu-Hsin Lu (National Chung Cheng University, Taiwan)and Yu-Feng Hsu (National Sun Yat-Sen University, Taiwan)
Copyright: 2011
Pages: 16
Source title: Surveillance Technologies and Early Warning Systems: Data Mining Applications for Risk Detection
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Ali Serhan Koyuncugil (Capital Markets Board of Turkey, Turkey, and Baskent University, Turkey)and Nermin Ozgulbas (Baskent University, Turkey)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61692-865-0.ch007

Purchase

View Bankruptcy Prediction by Supervised Machine Learning Techniques: A Comparative Study on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

It is very important for financial institutions which are capable of accurately predicting business failure. In literature, numbers of bankruptcy prediction models have been developed based on statistical and machine learning techniques. In particular, many machine learning techniques, such as neural networks, decision trees, etc. have shown better prediction performances than statistical ones. However, advanced machine learning techniques, such as classifier ensembles and stacked generalization have not been fully examined and compared in terms of their bankruptcy prediction performances. The aim of this chapter is to compare two different machine learning techniques, one statistical approach, two types of classifier ensembles, and three stacked generalization classifiers over three related datasets. The experimental results show that classifier ensembles by weighted voting perform the best in term of predication accuracy. On the other hand, for Type II errors on average stacked generalization and single classifiers perform better than classifier ensembles.

Related Content

Chirag Sharma, Amanpreet Kaur, Priyanka Datta, Yonis Gulzar. © 2025. 30 pages.
M. Johnpaul, Raam Sai Bharadwaj Miryala, Marica Mazurek, G. Jayaprakashnarayana, Ramesh Kumar Miryala. © 2025. 28 pages.
Jatin Arora, Gaganpreet Kaur, Monika Sethi, Saravjeet Singh. © 2025. 20 pages.
L. A. Anto Gracious, L. Sudha, B. Chitra, Gaganpreet Kaur, V. Sathya, P. Kabitha, R. Siva Subramanian. © 2025. 28 pages.
Bhavik Singla, Anuj Kumar Jain, Gaganpreet Kaur, Nitin Jain, Vishal Jain. © 2025. 28 pages.
P. Vijayalakshmi, K. Subashini, B. Selvalakshmi, G. Sudhakar, Anand Anbalagan, N. Bharathiraja, Gaganpreet Kaur. © 2025. 22 pages.
Djamel Saba, Abdelkader Hadidi. © 2025. 28 pages.
Body Bottom