The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
A Comparison between International Trade and R&D Collaboration Networks in the European Aerospace Sector
|
|
Author(s): Pier Paolo Angelini (Interuniversity Research Centre for Sustainable Development (CIRPS), Italy)and Lucio Biggiero (University of L'Aquila, Italy & CIRPS, Italy)
Copyright: 2016
Pages: 31
Source title:
Relational Methodologies and Epistemology in Economics and Management Sciences
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Lucio Biggiero (Università dell’ Aquila, Italy), Pier Paolo Angelini (Interuniversity Research Centre for Sustainable Development (CIRPS), Italy), Mario Basevi (Italian National Institute of Statistics, Italy), Nunzia Carbonara (Politecnico di Bari, Italy), Antonio Mastrogiorgio (Interuniversity Research Centre for Sustainable Development (CIRPS), Italy), Eliano Pessa (University of Pavia, Italy), Enrico Sevi (Università dell’ Aquila, Italy)and Marco Valente (Università dell’ Aquila, Italy)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-9770-6.ch005
Purchase
|
Abstract
Do trading countries also collaborate in R&D? This is the question that, facing with a number of methodological problems, here it is dealt with. Studying and comparing the international trade network and the R&D collaboration network of European countries in the aerospace sector, social network analysis offers a wide spectrum of methods and criteria either to make them comparable or to evaluate its similarity. International trade is a 1-mode directed and valued network, while the EU-subsidized R&D collaboration is an affiliation (2-mode) undirected and unvalued network, and the elementary units of this latter are organizations and not countries. Therefore, to the aim to make these two networks comparable, this paper shows and discusses a number of methodological problems and solutions offered to solve them, and provides a multi-faceted comparison in terms of various statistical and topological indicators. A comparative analysis of the two networks structures is made at aggregate and disaggregate level, and it is shown that the common centralization index is definitively inappropriate and misleading when applied to multi-centered networks like these, and especially to the R&D collaboration network. The final conclusion is that the two networks resemble in some important aspects, but differ in some minor traits. In particular, they are both shaped in a core-periphery structure, and in both cases important countries tend to exchange or collaborate more with marginal countries than between themselves.
Related Content
|
Iris-Panagiota Efthymiou, Symeon Sidiropoulos.
© 2024.
24 pages.
|
|
Nitish Kumar Minz, Anshul Saluja.
© 2024.
29 pages.
|
|
Iris-Panagiota Efthymiou.
© 2024.
24 pages.
|
|
Antoine Toni Trad.
© 2024.
43 pages.
|
|
Martha Ann Davis McGaw.
© 2024.
15 pages.
|
|
Agyabeng Nimfah Yeboah, Leila Goosen.
© 2024.
24 pages.
|
|
Surjit Singha.
© 2024.
23 pages.
|
|
|