IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Intrusion Detection System: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning-Based IDS

Intrusion Detection System: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning-Based IDS
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Amit Singh (Government of India, India), Jay Prakash (Vijay Singh Pathik Government (PG) College, India), Gaurav Kumar (Bennett University, India), Praphula Kumar Jain (GLA University, India)and Loknath Sai Ambati (Oklahoma City University, USA)
Copyright: 2024
Volume: 35
Issue: 1
Pages: 25
Source title: Journal of Database Management (JDM)
Editor(s)-in-Chief: Keng Siau (City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR)
DOI: 10.4018/JDM.338276

Purchase

View Intrusion Detection System: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning-Based IDS on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

The use of encrypted data, the diversity of new protocols, and the surge in the number of malicious activities worldwide have posed new challenges for intrusion detection systems (IDS). In this scenario, existing signature-based IDS are not performing well. Various researchers have proposed machine learning-based IDS to detect unknown malicious activities based on behaviour patterns. Results have shown that machine learning-based IDS perform better than signature-based IDS (SIDS) in identifying new malicious activities in the communication network. In this paper, the authors have analyzed the IDS dataset that contains the most current common attacks and evaluated the performance of network intrusion detection systems by adopting two data resampling techniques and 10 machine learning classifiers. It has been observed that the top three IDS models—KNeighbors, XGBoost, and AdaBoost—outperform binary-class classification with 99.49%, 99.14%, and 98.75% accuracy, and XGBoost, KNneighbors, and GaussianNB outperform in multi-class classification with 99.30%, 98.88%, and 96.66% accuracy.

Related Content

Pasi Raatikainen, Samuli Pekkola, Maria Mäkelä. © 2024. 30 pages.
Zhongliang Li, Yaofeng Tu, Zongmin Ma. © 2024. 25 pages.
Zongmin Ma, Daiyi Li, Jiawen Lu, Ruizhe Ma, Li Yan. © 2024. 32 pages.
Lavlin Agrawal, Pavankumar Mulgund, Raj Sharman. © 2024. 37 pages.
Jizi Li, Xiaodie Wang, Justin Z. Zhang, Longyu Li. © 2024. 34 pages.
Amit Singh, Jay Prakash, Gaurav Kumar, Praphula Kumar Jain, Loknath Sai Ambati. © 2024. 25 pages.
Ruizhe Ma, Weiwei Zhou, Zongmin Ma. © 2024. 21 pages.
Body Bottom