The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Which is the Best Way to Measure Job Performance: Self-Perceptions or Official Supervisor Evaluations?
Abstract
Among latent variables that can be used in e-collaboration research, job performance is a particularly important one. It measures what most e-collaboration tools in organizations aim to improve, namely the performance at work of individuals executing tasks collaboratively with others. The authors report on a comparative assessment of scores generated based on a self-reported job performance measurement instrument vis-à-vis official annual performance evaluation scores produced by supervisors. The results suggest that the self-reported measurement instrument not only presents good validity, good reliability and low collinearity; but that it may well be a better way of measuring job performance than supervisor scores.
Related Content
|
Nitesh Behare, Rashmi D. Mahajan, Meenakshi Singh, Vishwanathan Iyer, Ushmita Gupta, Pritesh P. Somani.
© 2024.
36 pages.
|
|
Shikha Mittal.
© 2024.
21 pages.
|
|
Albérico Travassos Rosário.
© 2024.
31 pages.
|
|
Carla Sofia Ribeiro Murteira, Ana Cristina Antunes.
© 2024.
23 pages.
|
|
Mario Sierra Martin, Alvaro Díaz Casquero, Marina Sánchez Pérez, Bárbara Rando Rodríguez.
© 2024.
17 pages.
|
|
Poornima Nair, Sunita Kumar.
© 2024.
18 pages.
|
|
Neli Maria Mengalli, Antonio Aparecido Carvalho.
© 2024.
16 pages.
|
|
|