IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Use of New ICTs as “Liberation” or “Repression” Technologies in Social Movements: The Need to Formulate Appropriate Media Policies

Use of New ICTs as “Liberation” or “Repression” Technologies in Social Movements: The Need to Formulate Appropriate Media Policies
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Brandie L. Martin (The Pennsylvania State University, USA)and Anthony A. Olorunnisola (The Pennsylvania State University, USA)
Copyright: 2013
Pages: 16
Source title: New Media Influence on Social and Political Change in Africa
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Anthony A. Olorunnisola (Pennsylvania State University, USA)and Aziz Douai (University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Canada)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4197-6.ch015

Purchase


Abstract

Participants in varying but recent citizen-led social movements in Kenya, Iran, Tunisia, and Egypt have found new voices by employing new ICTs. In some cases, new ICTs were used to mobilize citizens to join and/or to encourage use of violence against other ethnicities. In nearly all cases, the combined use of new ICTs kept the world informed of developments as ensuing protests progressed. In most cases, the use of new ICTs as alternative media motivated international actors’ intervention in averting or resolving ensuing crises. Foregoing engagements have also induced state actions such as appropriation of Internet and mobile phone SMS for counter-protest message dissemination and/or termination of citizens’ access. Against the background of the sociology and politics of social movements and a focus on the protests in Kenya and Egypt, this chapter broaches critical questions about recent social movements and processes: to what extent have the uses of new ICTs served as alternative platforms for positive citizens’ communication? When is use of new ICTs convertible into “weapons of mass destruction”? When does state repression or take-over of ICTs constitute security measures, and when is such action censorship? In the process, the chapter appraises the roles of local and international third parties to the engagement while underscoring conceptual definitions whose usage in studies of this kind should be conscientiously employed. Authors offer suggestions for future investigations.

Related Content

G. Surekha, Edwin Shalom Soji. © 2026. 20 pages.
P. Vidhya, S. Silvia Priscila. © 2026. 28 pages.
G. Surekha, Edwin Shalom Soji. © 2026. 20 pages.
P. Kiruthiga, S. Silvia Priscila. © 2026. 28 pages.
C. Ashwini, S.T.V.T. Anantha Krishnama Charyulu, N. Avinash Chowdary, S.T.V. Sathvik, A. Thenmozhi, Sureshkumar Somayajula, Muhammad Saleem. © 2026. 26 pages.
Divya Divya, Kamlesh Kumar Yadav. © 2026. 20 pages.
S. Kiruthika, S. Silvia Priscila. © 2026. 24 pages.
Body Bottom