IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

The Use of Web 2.0 Technologies in Formal and Informal Learning Settings

The Use of Web 2.0 Technologies in Formal and Informal Learning Settings
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Lisa A. Best (University of New Brunswick, Canada), Diane N. Buhay (University of New Brunswick, Canada), Katherine McGuire (University of New Brunswick, Canada), Signe Gurholt (New Brunswick Community College, Canada)and Shari Foley (Bayside Middle School, Canada)
Copyright: 2016
Pages: 23
Source title: Mobile Computing and Wireless Networks: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Information Resources Management Association (USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-8751-6.ch049

Purchase

View The Use of Web 2.0 Technologies in Formal and Informal Learning Settings on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

It is often assumed that because the current generation of students is more technologically competent than previous generations, they would prefer to use technology for both formal and informal learning. The results of a series of empirical studies indicated that students in formal settings preferred face-to-face contact with their instructors and used Web 2.0 tools for communication and to complete specific class assignments; in their personal lives, these technologies were used for communication, music and video downloads, and online gaming. Although students did not use social networking in their classes, the use of these tools may provide educators with an alternative to course management systems. Results from a community sample indicated a preference towards using the Internet for information gathering, and even though respondents reported that the incorporation of social networking sites in informal education settings would be nice, it was not expected. Overall, both student and community participants utilized technology that was familiar to them. Thus, assuming technological competence in our students and implementing various technological applications in the classroom may be counterproductive if guidance and training are not provided.

Related Content

J. Mangaiyarkkarasi, J. Shanthalakshmi Revathy. © 2024. 34 pages.
Gummadi Surya Prakash, W. Chandra, Shilpa Mehta, Rupesh Kumar. © 2024. 22 pages.
Duygu Nazan Gençoğlan. © 2024. 35 pages.
Smrity Dwivedi. © 2024. 20 pages.
Pallavi Sapkale, Shilpa Mehta. © 2024. 21 pages.
Pardhu Thottempudi, Vijay Kumar. © 2024. 43 pages.
Sathish Kumar Danasegaran, Elizabeth Caroline Britto, S. Dhanasekaran, G. Rajalakshmi, S. Lalithakumari, A. Sivasangari, G. Sathish Kumar. © 2024. 18 pages.
Body Bottom