The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
The Structure of Theory and the Structure of Scientific Revolutions: What Constitutes an Advance in Theory?
Abstract
From a Kuhnian perspective, a paradigmatic revolution in management science will significantly improve our understanding of the business world and show practitioners (including managers and consultants) how to become much more effective. Without an objective measure of revolution, however, the door is open for spurious claims of revolutionary advance. Such claims cause confusion among scholars and practitioners and reduce the legitimacy of university management programs. Metatheoretical methods, based on insights from systems theory, provide new tools for analyzing the structure of theory. Propositional analysis is one such method that may be applied to objectively quantify the formal robustness of management theory. In this chapter, I use propositional analysis to analyze different versions of a theory as it evolves across 1,500 years of history. This analysis shows how the increasing robustness of theory anticipates the arrival of revolution and suggests an innovative and effective way for scholars and practitioners to develop and evaluate theories of management.
Related Content
Monia Ben Ltaifa, Walid Chouari, Abdelkader Mohamed Sghaier Derbali.
© 2024.
30 pages.
|
Filiz Mızrak.
© 2024.
21 pages.
|
Aytaç Gökmen.
© 2024.
12 pages.
|
Maria Aweis Mayow, Aytaç Gökmen, Dilek Temiz.
© 2024.
27 pages.
|
Ahlem Baccouche, Houssem Bouzgarrou, Meriem Jouirou, Moufida Ben Saada.
© 2024.
21 pages.
|
Ashwani Panesar, Rohit Sood.
© 2024.
20 pages.
|
Boussairi Slimani, Moufida Ben Saada, Sameh Halaoua.
© 2024.
22 pages.
|
|
|