IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Statistical Discourse Analysis: Testing Educational Hypotheses with Large Datasets of Electronic Discourse

Statistical Discourse Analysis: Testing Educational Hypotheses with Large Datasets of Electronic Discourse
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Ming Ming Chiu (University at Buffalo, State University of New York, USA)and Gaowei Chen (University of Pittsburgh, USA)
Copyright: 2014
Pages: 19
Source title: Innovative Methods and Technologies for Electronic Discourse Analysis
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Hwee Ling Lim (The Petroleum Institute-Abu Dhabi, UAE)and Fay Sudweeks (Murdoch University, Australia)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4426-7.ch013

Purchase

View Statistical Discourse Analysis: Testing Educational Hypotheses with Large Datasets of Electronic Discourse on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Educators are increasingly using electronic discourse for student learning and problem solving, partially due to its time and space flexibility and greater opportunities for information processing and higher order thinking. When researchers try to statistically analyze the relationships among electronic discourse messages however, they often face difficulties regarding the data (missing data, many codes, non-linear trees of messages), dependent variables (topic differences, time differences, discrete, infrequent, multiple dependent variables) and explanatory variables (sequences of messages, cross-level moderation, indirect effects, false positives). Statistical discourse analysis (SDA) addresses all of these difficulties as shown in analyses of social cues in 894 messages posted by 183 students during 60 online asynchronous discussions. The results showed that disagreements increased negative social cues, supporting the hypothesis that these participants did not save face during disagreements, but attacked face. Using these types of analyses and results, researchers can inform designs and uses of electronic discourse.

Related Content

Supriadi Supriadi, Andi Asrifan. © 2026. 26 pages.
Vishal Jain, Archan Mitra, Sanchita Paul. © 2026. 20 pages.
Sooraj Kumar Maurya, Vikash Ranjan Singh. © 2026. 24 pages.
Mustafa Kayyali. © 2026. 26 pages.
Muhammad Rapi. © 2026. 26 pages.
Andi Sukri Syamsuri, Andi Asrifan. © 2026. 26 pages.
Siti Hajar Larekeng. © 2026. 28 pages.
Body Bottom