IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Software Process Improvement for Small and Very Small Enterprises

Software Process Improvement for Small and Very Small Enterprises
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Mohammad Zarour (King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Saudi Arabia), Alain Abran (École de Technologie Supérieure, Canada)and Jean-Marc Desharnais (Bogaziçi University, Turkey)
Copyright: 2014
Pages: 22
Source title: Software Design and Development: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Information Resources Management Association (USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4301-7.ch066

Purchase

View Software Process Improvement for Small and Very Small Enterprises on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Software organizations have been struggling for decades to improve the quality of their products by improving their software development processes. Designing an improvement program for a software development process is a demanding and complex task. This task consists of two main processes: the assessment process and the improvement process. A successful improvement process requires first a successful assessment; failing to assess the organization’s software development process could create unsatisfactory results. Although very small enterprises (VSEs) have several interesting characteristics such as flexibility and ease of communications, initiating an assessment and improvement process based on well-known Software Process Improvement (SPI) models such as Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) and ISO 15504 is more challenging in such VSEs. Accordingly, researchers and practitioners have designed a few assessment methods to meet the needs of VSEs organizations to initiate an SPI process. This chapter discusses the assessment and improvement process in VSEs; we first examine VSEs characteristics and problems. Next, we discuss the different assessment methods and standards designed to fit the needs of such organizations and how to compare them. Finally, we present future research work perceived in this context.

Related Content

Babita Srivastava. © 2024. 21 pages.
Sakuntala Rao, Shalini Chandra, Dhrupad Mathur. © 2024. 27 pages.
Satya Sekhar Venkata Gudimetla, Naveen Tirumalaraju. © 2024. 24 pages.
Neeta Baporikar. © 2024. 23 pages.
Shankar Subramanian Subramanian, Amritha Subhayan Krishnan, Arumugam Seetharaman. © 2024. 35 pages.
Charu Banga, Farhan Ujager. © 2024. 24 pages.
Munir Ahmad. © 2024. 27 pages.
Body Bottom