The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Social Partnership and Distance in Representations of Subjects of Pedagogical Processes (Group Research)
|
Author(s): Anna Mihailovna Molokostova (Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis, Russia), Irina Sergeevna Yakimanskaya (Orenburg State Medical University, Russia)and Milyausha Yakubovna Ibragimova (Kazan Federal University, Russia)
Copyright: 2019
Pages: 9
Source title:
Handbook of Research on Ecosystem-Based Theoretical Models of Learning and Communication
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Elena A. Railean (Siberian Federal University, Russia & Moscow State Pedagogical University, Russia & Free International University of Moldova, Moldova)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-7853-6.ch011
Purchase
|
Abstract
The environmental approach in the humanities has become widespread due to the request of pedagogical and organizational practice. The spatial component can be diagnosed, built, or adjusted by measuring and controlling the social distance between the subjects of the educational process. The indicator of social distance is a diagnostic sign of trust and security in the educational process. The measured characteristics of physical space, including distance to objects, are used to describe the perceived positions in society and in relation to other participants of interaction. Contradictions and conflicts appear as a result of divergence in perceived social distances that determine the attitudes and norms of interaction between subjects of the educational process. The chapter showed that the conditionally unfavorable environment is characterized by the fact that perceived social distances are more important up to the preference not to see other subjects of the educational process.
Related Content
Sylvia Robertson.
© 2023.
28 pages.
|
Dimitrios Stamovlasis, Charalampos Tsanidis.
© 2023.
23 pages.
|
Ikram Chelliq, Lamya Anoir, Mohamed Erradi, Mohamed Khaldi.
© 2023.
26 pages.
|
Vasiliki Ioakeimidou.
© 2023.
27 pages.
|
Eleni Bonti.
© 2023.
25 pages.
|
Lamya Anoir, Ikram Chelliq, Mohamed Erradi, Mohamed Khaldi.
© 2023.
29 pages.
|
Shibu Puthalath, M. R. Mallaiah, Viswesh Sekhar.
© 2023.
17 pages.
|
|
|