IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Social Media Applied to Tourism and Hospitality: The Case of Hotels in the Porto Metropolitan Area

Social Media Applied to Tourism and Hospitality: The Case of Hotels in the Porto Metropolitan Area
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Luís Pacheco (Portucalense Infante D. Henrique University, Portugal)and Fernando Moreira (Portucalense Infante D. Henrique University, Portugal)
Copyright: 2020
Pages: 25
Source title: Handbook of Research on Social Media Applications for the Tourism and Hospitality Sector
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Célia M.Q. Ramos (University of Algarve, Portugal), Cláudia Ribeiro de Almeida (University of Algarve, Portugal)and Paula Odete Fernandes (Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, Portugal)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-1947-9.ch016

Purchase

View Social Media Applied to Tourism and Hospitality: The Case of Hotels in the Porto Metropolitan Area on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Online hotel reviews, ratings, or opinions have gained importance with the growth of social media tools. The objective of this chapter is to study the impact of specific satisfaction attributes on overall satisfaction. It is used a secondary data set obtained from three of the most influential online travel platforms, being analyzed the guests' average ratings for around 130 hotel units, distributed by four quality segments, located in the Porto metropolitan area. The application of this methodology to a large sample of Portuguese hotels has not been done before, been that the main contribution of this study. It is evidenced that the different platforms, while all incorporating consumer reviews as primary social knowledge, are distinct from each other on some aspects. The three platforms present roughly the same supply of hotels, albeit presenting some differences in terms of volume of data. In terms of specific attributes, with the exception of “service,” the three platforms present significant differences that may reflect the different user bases on these platforms.

Related Content

Aseela Al Harthi, Mohammad Soliman, Anam Palla. © 2026. 28 pages.
Christoph Pachucki. © 2026. 32 pages.
Nawel Chrouda, Mouna Damak Turki. © 2026. 36 pages.
Mariana Taveira Gouveia, Bruno Barbosa Sousa, Cláudia Ribau. © 2026. 22 pages.
Birendra Kishore Roy. © 2026. 38 pages.
Aye Thiri Nyunt, Brij Kotak, Ravi Chauhan, Rituraj Jain, Kumar J. Parmar, Damodharan Palaniappan, T. Premavathi. © 2026. 38 pages.
Muhammad Usman Tariq. © 2026. 26 pages.
Body Bottom