Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

A Review of Knowledge Management Frameworks

A Review of Knowledge Management Frameworks
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Brian Lehaney (Coventry University, UK), Steve Clarke (University of Hull, UK), Elayne Coakes (University of Westminster, UK) and Gillian Jack (University of Glamorgan, UK)
Copyright: 2004
Pages: 117
Source title: Beyond Knowledge Management
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Brian Lehaney (University of Luton Business School, UK), Steve Clarke (University of Hull Business School, UK), Elayne Coakes (University of Westminster, UK) and Gillian Jack (University of Glamorgan, UK)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-180-3.ch005


View A Review of Knowledge Management Frameworks on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.


This research is concerned with developing a framework for the evaluation of an organisation’s potential to engage in knowledge management (an organisation’s ‘KM-readiness’, or KMR). To recap, Chapter 3 offered background information and empirical evidence of issues that need to be considered in organisations, Chapter 4 provided an overview of knowledge management, and Chapter 5 explored organisational structure, strategy, and culture in the context of knowledge management. Discussion thus far would not be sufficient to provide a robust and reasoned framework. This chapter is intended to accumulate some further and more focussed ideas as to what should be in a KMR framework, and to assist in the understanding of the material presented here and further on in this thesis. This chapter, therefore, provides a comprehensive review of published knowledge management frameworks that purport to address evaluation, implementation, and other connected areas. Before continuing, it is important to set this exercise in context. The review of frameworks is distinct from a review of literature in which the frameworks are presented. The latter is not intended here. For example, a review of a paper may involve a comprehensive critique, which includes exploration into the general area of research, clarification of the hypothesis, detailed examination of research methods and methodology, literature review, and comprehensive examination of data representation and quality. Such a review would consider the presentation of the paper, and it would critically reflect on the overall purpose of the paper and contribution made to new knowledge, either conceptual or practical. This review focuses solely on the frameworks presented in a paper and in particular those that may address evaluation of knowledge management in an organisation.

Related Content

Jaime González-Masip. © 2021. 17 pages.
María de la Soledad Zapata Agüera. © 2021. 27 pages.
Jaime González-Masip. © 2021. 18 pages.
Zeynep Merve Ünal. © 2021. 27 pages.
Ledian Valle Mestre, Matilde García Pérez., Daniel Jiménez-Jiménez. © 2021. 15 pages.
Lucía Muñoz Pascual, Jesús Galende. © 2021. 20 pages.
Mercedes Rubio-Andrés, Mª del Mar Ramos-González, Miguel Ángel Sastre-Castillo. © 2021. 25 pages.
Body Bottom