The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Requirements Engineering Process Improvement and Related Models
|
|
Author(s): Badariah Solemon (Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Malaysia), Shamsul Sahibuddin (Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia)and Abdul Azim Abd Ghani (Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia)
Copyright: 2012
Pages: 16
Source title:
Software Process Improvement and Management: Approaches and Tools for Practical Development
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Shukor Sanim Mohd Fauzi (University Teknologi Mara, Malaysia), Mohd Hairul Nizam Md Nasir (University of Malaya, Malaysia), Nuraminah Ramli (Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia)and Shamsul Sahibuddin (Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61350-141-2.ch002
Purchase
|
Abstract
Requirements Engineering (RE) is a key discipline in software development, and several standards and models are available to help assess and improve RE processes. However, different standards and models can also help achieve different improvement goals. Thus, organizations are challenged to select these standards and models to best suit their specific context and available resources. This chapter presents a review of selected RE-specific and generic process improvement models that are available in the public domain. The review aims to provide preliminary information that might be needed by organizations in selecting these models. The chapter begins with analyses of how RE maturity is addressed in the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) for Development. Then, it describes the principal characteristics of, and the assessment and improvement framework applied in four RE-specific process assessment and improvement models: the Requirements Engineering Good Practice Guide (REGPG), the Requirements Engineering Process Maturity(REPM), the Requirements Capability Maturity Model (R-CMM), and the Market-Driven Requirements Engineering Process Model (MDREPM). This chapter also examines the utility and lesson learned of these models.
Related Content
|
Subrata Tikadar, Kaushik Paul, Abhishek Mukhopadhyay.
© 2026.
26 pages.
|
|
Devanshi Shrivastava, Debanshi Chakraborty, Manjusha Pandey, Siddharth Swarup Rautray.
© 2026.
32 pages.
|
|
Harshita Gupta, Suman Suman Majumder.
© 2026.
12 pages.
|
|
Subhajit Ghosh.
© 2026.
38 pages.
|
|
Sanjib Kundu, Sourav Kayal.
© 2026.
40 pages.
|
|
Sudip Chatterjee, Pronaya Bhattacharya, Subrata Tikadar.
© 2026.
14 pages.
|
|
Chandan Kumar Singh.
© 2026.
40 pages.
|
|
|