IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Reconstruction of Missing Hourly Precipitation Data to Increase Training Data Set for ANN

Reconstruction of Missing Hourly Precipitation Data to Increase Training Data Set for ANN
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Hema Nagaraja (Department of Computer Science, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, Noida, India), Krishna Kant (Manav Rachna International University, Faridabad, India)and K. Rajalakshmi (Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, Noida, India)
Copyright: 2022
Pages: 24
Source title: Research Anthology on Artificial Neural Network Applications
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Information Resources Management Association (USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-2408-7.ch011

Purchase

View Reconstruction of Missing Hourly Precipitation Data to Increase Training Data Set for ANN on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

This paper investigates the hourly precipitation estimation capacities of ANN using raw data and reconstructed data using proposed Precipitation Sliding Window Period (PSWP) method. The precipitation data from 11 Automatic Weather Station (AWS) of Delhi has been obtained from Jan 2015 to Feb 2016. The proposed PSWP method uses both time and space dimension to fill the missing precipitation values. Hourly precipitation follows patterns in particular period along with its neighbor stations. Based on these patterns of precipitation, Local Cluster Sliding Window Period (LCSWP) and Global Cluster Sliding Window Period (GCSWP) are defined for single AWS and all AWSs respectively. Further, GCSWP period is classified into four different categories to fill the missing precipitation data based on patterns followed in it. The experimental results indicate that ANN trained with reconstructed data has better estimation results than the ANN trained with raw data. The average RMSE for ANN trained with raw data is 0.44 and while that for neural network trained with reconstructed data is 0.34.

Related Content

Vinod Kumar, Himanshu Prajapati, Sasikala Ponnusamy. © 2023. 18 pages.
Sougatamoy Biswas. © 2023. 14 pages.
Ganga Devi S. V. S.. © 2023. 10 pages.
Gotam Singh Lalotra, Ashok Sharma, Barun Kumar Bhatti, Suresh Singh. © 2023. 15 pages.
Nimish Kumar, Himanshu Verma, Yogesh Kumar Sharma. © 2023. 16 pages.
R. Soujanya, Ravi Mohan Sharma, Manish Manish Maheshwari, Divya Prakash Shrivastava. © 2023. 12 pages.
Nimish Kumar, Himanshu Verma, Yogesh Kumar Sharma. © 2023. 22 pages.
Body Bottom