The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Practice vs. Possession: Epistemological Implications on the Nature of Organizational Knowledge and Cognition
Abstract
Organizational knowledge is at the center of the debate focused on the nature of knowledge, where the perspective of knowledge as possession opposes the perspective of knowledge as practice. These two views are rooted in the radical versions of realist and constructivist epistemology, respectively, according to which knowledge is an object or a practice. Far from being a Byzantine dispute, the adoption of one or the other has relevant and concrete consequences for the design and management of IS/IT, because as such, the two paradigms result incommensurable in both theoretical and methodological aspects. However, from a moderate and middle-ground version the following fruitful implications would stem: 1) the juxtaposition would dissolve, and a dual nature of knowledge as object and practice would emerge; 2) the epistemology of pragmatism would be able to account for all the concepts and methods employed by the two fronts, thus terminating a sterile “paradigm war”; 3) the theory of autopoiesis would become irrelevant and eventually even misleading; 4) standard scientific methodologies and simulation models would be acknowledged as useful and common tools for progressive confrontations among the supporters of both the paradigms; 5) the development of IS/IT studies and the design of knowledge management systems would substantially benefit.
Related Content
|
Yair Wiseman.
© 2021.
11 pages.
|
|
Mário Pereira Véstias.
© 2021.
15 pages.
|
|
Mahfuzulhoq Chowdhury, Martin Maier.
© 2021.
15 pages.
|
|
Gen'ichi Yasuda.
© 2021.
12 pages.
|
|
Alba J. Jerónimo, María P. Barrera, Manuel F. Caro, Adán A. Gómez.
© 2021.
19 pages.
|
|
Gregor Donaj, Mirjam Sepesy Maučec.
© 2021.
14 pages.
|
|
Udit Singhania, B. K. Tripathy.
© 2021.
11 pages.
|
|
|