The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Modeling Log S: Evaluating a Novel Predictive Approach Using Machine Learning on Diverse Datasets
|
|
Author(s): Imane Aitouhanni (ENSIAS, SSLAB, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco), Amine Berqia (ENSIAS, SSLAB, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco), Amol D. Vibhute (Symbiosis Institute of Computer Studies and Research (SICSR), Symbiosis International University, Pune, India), Yassine Mouniane (Natural Resources and Sustainable Development laboratory, Faculty of Sciences, Ibn Tofail University, Kenitra, Morocco)and Balakrishnama Manohar (Vellore Institute of Technology, India)
Copyright: 2025
Pages: 24
Source title:
Environmental Monitoring Technologies for Improving Global Human Health
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Olga Anatolievna Pasko (National Open Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia)and Nadezhda Anatolievna Lebedeva (International Personnel Academy, Germany)
DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-8532-6.ch018
Purchase
|
Abstract
Assessing the aqueous solubility of chemical compounds is one of the main tasks of molecular chemistry, with important implications for drug discovery and other research. In this respect, this study proposes a predictive model for Log S and offers a comprehensive comparative analysis of several machine learning algorithms on six different datasets, evaluating performance in terms of R-squared value, mean square error and execution time on various datasets that differ in composition and source and are used in natural and synthetic contexts. In addition, a performance comparison of the algorithms has been made in order to identify the most efficient one for solubility prediction using molecular data. Results are clearly articulated and presented, with appropriate reasoning and evidence provided. The research question is appropriately addressed in the study by clarifying the differences in the response of the algorithms across six datasets of different compositions and sources. It is clear that the results can facilitate the process of comparing different machine learning algorithms.
Related Content
|
Muhammad Farooq Umer.
© 2026.
28 pages.
|
|
Awesh Khati, Anindita Das, Debajit Karmakar.
© 2026.
26 pages.
|
|
Minhaj Ahmed Qidwai, Mohammad Kabir Gawhari.
© 2026.
20 pages.
|
|
Fozia Asif, Minhaj Ahmed Qidwai.
© 2026.
14 pages.
|
|
Saurabh Chandra, Bhupinder Singh.
© 2026.
20 pages.
|
|
Anshika Tyagi, Vishal Jain.
© 2026.
26 pages.
|
|
Saleema Gulzar, Samina Subzali Vertejee, Tazeen Saeed Ali, Rozina Karmaliani.
© 2026.
16 pages.
|
|
|