Methodological Issues in the Evaluation of System Analysis and Design Techniques

View Sample PDF

Author(s): Andrew Gemino (Simon Fraser University, Canada)
Copyright: 2005
Pages: 17
Source title: Business Systems Analysis with Ontologies
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Peter F. Green (University of Queensland, Australia) and Michael Rosemann (Queensland University of Technology, Australia)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-339-5.ch011

Keywords: Business & Management / Business Information Systems / Business Science Reference

Purchase

View Methodological Issues in the Evaluation of System Analysis and Design Techniques on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

This chapter examines methodological issues arising in the comparison of systems analysis and design techniques. An argument is made to establish a foundation of research and more broadly consider the management of scope in analysis and design research. A discussion of why and how we evaluate techniques is provided. A generalized approach combining both deductive and inductive reasoning is presented and a combined grammar-based and cognitive-based approach to comparison is discussed. In addition, concepts from Friedman’s economic methodology are applied in the choice between alternative ontologies that underlie grammar-based comparisons. The chapter concludes with a set of nine questions that researchers should consider when designing and developing research in the evaluation of systems analysis and design techniques.

The IRMA Community

Research IRM

Methodological Issues in the Evaluation of System Analysis and Design Techniques

Purchase

Abstract

Related Content

IRMA Sponsors