IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Macroergonomic Work Systems' Design Factors and Elements: A Literature Review

Macroergonomic Work Systems' Design Factors and Elements: A Literature Review
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Arturo Realyvásquez (Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Mexico), Aidé Aracely Maldonado-Macías (Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Mexico)and Jaime Romero-González (Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Mexico)
Copyright: 2016
Pages: 21
Source title: Handbook of Research on Managerial Strategies for Achieving Optimal Performance in Industrial Processes
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Giner Alor-Hernández (Instituto Tecnológico de Orizaba, Mexico), Cuauhtémoc Sánchez-Ramírez (Instituto Tecnológico de Orizaba, Mexico)and Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz (Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Mexico)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0130-5.ch007

Purchase

View Macroergonomic Work Systems' Design Factors and Elements: A Literature Review on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Currently there is no a literature survey which evaluates and classifies the papers according to the macroergonomic factors and elements that authors consider needed to work systems' design. For that reason, this chapter offers a review to identify the most frequent macroergonomic work systems' design factors and elements enounced in literature and propose a classification for them. A manual search was performed in seven databases by using keywords such as sociotechnical systems, macroergonomics, and work systems design. Bibliographical sources were classified into five main groups, corresponding to the factors of work systems' design, named Peron factor, Organization factor, factor of Tools and Technology, Tasks factor, and Environment factor, and their corresponding subgroups (elements). The macroergonomic Organization factor presented the highest frequency, while the macroergonomic factor of Tools and Technology presented the lowest frequency. Regarding the elements, Teamwork was the most frequent, while Advanced Manufacturing technology and Work Schedules were the less frequent.

Related Content

Sandhya Avasthi, Tanushree Sanwal, Shivani Sharma, Shweta Roy. © 2023. 23 pages.
Subha Karumban, Shouvik Sanyal, Madan Mohan Laddunuri, Vijayan Dhanasingh Sivalinga, Vidhya Shanmugam, Vijay Bose, Mahesh B. N., Ramakrishna Narasimhaiah, Dhanabalan Thangam, Satheesh Pandian Murugan. © 2023. 17 pages.
Aditya Saxena, Devansh Chauhan, Shilpi Sharma. © 2023. 26 pages.
Eduardo José Villegas-Jaramillo, Mauricio Orozco-Alzate. © 2023. 33 pages.
Revathi A., Poonguzhali S.. © 2023. 18 pages.
Indu Malik, Anurag Singh Baghel. © 2023. 18 pages.
Shanu Sharma, Tushar Chand Kapoor, Misha Kakkar, Rishi Kumar. © 2023. 24 pages.
Body Bottom