IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Leadership Style, Anonymity, and the Discussion of an Ethical Issue in an Electronic Context

Leadership Style, Anonymity, and the Discussion of an Ethical Issue in an Electronic Context
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Surinder S. Kahai (State University of New York at Binghamton, USA)and Bruce J. Avolio (Gallup Leadership Institute, University of Nebraska, USA)
Copyright: 2008
Pages: 19
Source title: Information Security and Ethics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Hamid Nemati (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-937-3.ch040

Purchase

View Leadership Style, Anonymity, and the Discussion of an Ethical Issue in an Electronic Context on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

A laboratory experiment was conducted with 42 student groups to evaluate the effects of transactional vs. transformational leadership styles and anonymity when groups supported by an Electronic Meeting System (EMS) discussed the ethical issue of copying copyrighted software. A confederate leader displayed either transformational or transactional behaviors. Transformational leaders motivate effort by raising the awareness of followers to make them aspire to higher-order needs and values and by developing them to fulfill their aspirations. Transactional leaders motivate effort by highlighting the contractual exchange involved in a relationship. Participants working with a transformational confederate were more likely to make arguments that challenged the copying of copyrighted software than those working with one who was more transactional. These arguments, in turn, caused groups exposed to such arguments to have greater deviation among its members in intentions to copy the software. Participants working with a transactional confederate were more likely to make arguments in favor of copying copyrighted software. These arguments, in turn, caused groups exposed to such arguments to have a greater mean of intentions to copy the software. Implications for practice and future research on ethics and leadership in the electronic context are discussed.

Related Content

Chaymaâ Boutahiri, Ayoub Nouaiti, Aziz Bouazi, Abdallah Marhraoui Hsaini. © 2024. 14 pages.
Imane Cheikh, Khaoula Oulidi Omali, Mohammed Nabil Kabbaj, Mohammed Benbrahim. © 2024. 30 pages.
Tahiri Omar, Herrou Brahim, Sekkat Souhail, Khadiri Hassan. © 2024. 19 pages.
Sekkat Souhail, Ibtissam El Hassani, Anass Cherrafi. © 2024. 14 pages.
Meryeme Bououchma, Brahim Herrou. © 2024. 14 pages.
Touria Jdid, Idriss Chana, Aziz Bouazi, Mohammed Nabil Kabbaj, Mohammed Benbrahim. © 2024. 16 pages.
Houda Bentarki, Abdelkader Makhoute, Tőkési Karoly. © 2024. 10 pages.
Body Bottom