IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

The INTERNORM Project: Bridging Two Worlds of Expert- and Lay-Knowledge in Standardization

The INTERNORM Project: Bridging Two Worlds of Expert- and Lay-Knowledge in Standardization
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Jean-Christophe Graz (Université de Lausanne, Switzerland)and Christophe Hauert (Université de Lausanne, Switzerland)
Copyright: 2013
Pages: 11
Source title: Innovations in Organizational IT Specification and Standards Development
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Kai Jakobs (RWTH Aachen University, Germany)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-2160-2.ch009

Purchase

View The INTERNORM Project: Bridging Two Worlds of Expert- and Lay-Knowledge in Standardization on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

This paper presents a pilot project to reinforce participatory practices in standardization. The INTERNORM project creates an interactive knowledge center based on the sharing of academic skills and experiences accumulated by the civil society, especially consumer associations, environmental associations and trade unions to strengthen the participatory process of standardization. The first objective of the project is action-oriented: INTERNORM provides a common knowledge pool supporting the participation of civil society actors to international standard-setting activities by bringing them together with academic experts in working groups and providing logistic and financial support to their participation in meetings of national and international technical committees. The second objective is analytical: the standardization action provides a research field for a better understanding of the participatory dynamics underpinning international standardization. This paper presents three incentives that explain civil society (non-)involvement in standardization that overcome conventional resource-based hypotheses: an operational incentive related to the use of standards in the selective goods provided by associations to their membership; a thematic incentive provided by the setting of priorities by strategic committees created in some standardization organization; and a rhetorical incentive related to the discursive resource that civil society concerns offers to the different stakeholders.

Related Content

Jeff Mangers, Christof Oberhausen, Meysam Minoufekr, Peter Plapper. © 2020. 26 pages.
Sylvain Maechler, Jean-Christophe Graz. © 2020. 27 pages.
Sabrina Petersohn, Sophie Biesenbender, Christoph Thiedig. © 2020. 41 pages.
Jonas Lundsten, Jesper Mayntz Paasch. © 2020. 21 pages.
Justus Alexander Baron. © 2020. 31 pages.
Vasileios Mavroeidis, Petros E. Maravelakis, Katarzyna Tarnawska. © 2020. 19 pages.
Hiam Serhan, Doudja Saïdi-Kabeche. © 2020. 30 pages.
Body Bottom