IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

An Improved Dynavote E-Voting Protocol Implementation

An Improved Dynavote E-Voting Protocol Implementation
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Abdulwasiu Kailani AbdulRahim (Abdulwasiu Kailani AbdulRahimUniversity of Agriculture, Nigeria), Olusegun Folorunso (University of Agriculture, Nigeria)and Sushil Sharma (Ball State University, USA)
Copyright: 2013
Pages: 19
Source title: Adoption of Virtual Technologies for Business, Educational, and Governmental Advancements
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Sushil K. Sharma (Ball State University, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-2053-7.ch006

Purchase

View An Improved Dynavote E-Voting Protocol Implementation on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Electronic voting—the use of computers or computerized voting equipment to cast and tabulate and tally ballots in an election in a trustable manner—is a pillar of e-Government. The DynaVote voting protocol system proposed by Cetinkaya and Koc (2007) is assumed secure and practicable on a network. However, the DynaVote e-Voting protocol does not completely protect the voting counter against impersonated votes, especially when the pseudo-Vote identities are known by the wrong voter or compromised by authorities. To address this problem, a prototype called improved DynaVote e-Vote protocol was designed to protect the counter from anomalies associated with counting impersonated votes (multiple votes) in the same election. This was achieved by introducing biometric fingerprint and pseudo voter identities (PVID) encryption for each voter during voter registration via online or data mining of population data containing fingerprint biometrics. Furthermore, fingerprint reader and RSA public key cryptography is used in PVID to eliminate counting impersonated votes. The performance results showed that improved DynaVote e-Vote protocol is more reliable, eligible, and accurate, and protects voter privacy against other e-Vote protocols.

Related Content

G. SudhaAnanthi. © 2026. 28 pages.
Ajay B. Gadicha, Sherif Mohamed Abdelaal Ismail, Riya Dolas, Vijay B. Gadicha, Mohini M. Mohod. © 2026. 22 pages.
Barkha Sachin Dange. © 2026. 40 pages.
Anuradha Phadnis, Syed Hassan Imam Gardezi, Jyothi Pawar, Sweta Banerjee, P. Selvakumar, S. Madhu. © 2026. 30 pages.
Neetal Vyas, Avinash Hanmant Ghadage, Pradip Sanatkumar Padhye, P. Selvakumar, T. C. Manjunath, S. Madhu. © 2026. 26 pages.
Yuvraj Singh Shergill, Raj Singh, H. J. Prajwal, Shaeril Almeida. © 2026. 28 pages.
Deepak Gupta, K. Shobha, D. Hariprasad, Rakhi Chawla, K. Yadagiri, M. V. B. T. Santhi, Someshwar Siddi. © 2026. 30 pages.
Body Bottom