IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Genetic Algorithms Quality Assessment Implementing Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic

Genetic Algorithms Quality Assessment Implementing Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Tania Pencheva (Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria), Maria Angelova (Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria)and Krassimir Atanassov (Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria)
Copyright: 2015
Pages: 28
Source title: Research Methods: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Information Resources Management Association (USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-7456-1.ch049

Purchase

View Genetic Algorithms Quality Assessment Implementing Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Intuitionistic fuzzy logic has been implemented in this investigation aiming to derive intuitionistic fuzzy estimations of model parameters of yeast fed-batch cultivation. Considered here are standard simple and multi-population genetic algorithms as well as their modifications differ from each other in execution order of main genetic operators (selection, crossover, and mutation). All are applied for the purpose of parameter identification of S. cerevisiae fed-batch cultivation. Performances of the examined algorithms have been assessed before and after the application of a procedure for narrowing the range of model parameters variation. Behavior of standard simple genetic algorithm has been also examined for different values of proof as the most sensitive genetic algorithms parameter toward convergence time, namely, generation gap (GGAP). Results obtained after the intuitionistic fuzzy logic implementation for assessment of genetic algorithms performance have been compared. As a result, the most reliable algorithm/value of GGAP ensuring the fastest and the most valuable solution is distinguished.

Related Content

Tutita M. Casa, Fabiana Cardetti, Madelyn W. Colonnese. © 2024. 14 pages.
R. Alex Smith, Madeline Day Price, Tessa L. Arsenault, Sarah R. Powell, Erin Smith, Michael Hebert. © 2024. 19 pages.
Marta T. Magiera, Mohammad Al-younes. © 2024. 27 pages.
Christopher Dennis Nazelli, S. Asli Özgün-Koca, Deborah Zopf. © 2024. 31 pages.
Ethan P. Smith. © 2024. 22 pages.
James P. Bywater, Sarah Lilly, Jennifer L. Chiu. © 2024. 20 pages.
Ian Jones, Jodie Hunter. © 2024. 20 pages.
Body Bottom