IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Evaluating Semantic Web Service Technologies: Criteria, Approaches and Challenges

Evaluating Semantic Web Service Technologies: Criteria, Approaches and Challenges
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Ulrich Küster (Institute of Computer Science, Germany), Birgitta König-Ries (Institute of Computer Science, Germany)and Matthias Klusch (German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence, Germany)
Copyright: 2010
Pages: 24
Source title: Progressive Concepts for Semantic Web Evolution: Applications and Developments
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Miltiadis D. Lytras (Effat University, Saudi Arabia)and Amit Sheth (Kno.e.sis Center, Wright State University, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-992-2.ch001

Purchase

View Evaluating Semantic Web Service Technologies: Criteria, Approaches and Challenges on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

In recent years, a huge amount of research effort and funding has been devoted to the area of semantic web services (SWS). This has resulted in the proposal of numerous competing approaches to facilitate the automation of discovery, composition and mediation for web services using semantic annotations. However, despite of a wealth of theoretical work, too little effort has been spent towards the comparative experimental evaluation of the competing approaches so far. Progress in scientific development and industrial adoption is thereby hindered. An established evaluation methodology and standard benchmarks that allow the comparative evaluation of different frameworks are thus needed for the further advancement of the field. To this end, a criteria model for SWS evaluation is presented and the existing approaches towards SWS evaluation are comprehensively analyzed. Their shortcomings are discussed in order to identify the fundamental issues of SWS evaluation. Based on this discussion, a research agenda towards agreed upon evaluation methodologies is proposed.

Related Content

. © 2020. 58 pages.
. © 2020. 52 pages.
. © 2020. 10 pages.
. © 2020. 14 pages.
. © 2020. 33 pages.
. © 2020. 13 pages.
. © 2020. 36 pages.
Body Bottom