IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Effective Multi-Label Classification Using Data Preprocessing

Effective Multi-Label Classification Using Data Preprocessing
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Vaishali S. Tidake (MVPS's KBT College of Engineering, Nashik, India)and Shirish S. Sane (K. K. Wagh Institute of Engineering Education and Research, Nashik, India)
Copyright: 2021
Pages: 20
Source title: Data Preprocessing, Active Learning, and Cost Perceptive Approaches for Resolving Data Imbalance
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Dipti P. Rana (Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat, India)and Rupa G. Mehta (Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat, India)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-7371-6.ch005

Purchase

View Effective Multi-Label Classification Using Data Preprocessing on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Usage of feature similarity is expected when the nearest neighbors are to be explored. Examples in multi-label datasets are associated with multiple labels. Hence, the use of label dissimilarity accompanied by feature similarity may reveal better neighbors. Information extracted from such neighbors is explored by devised MLFLD and MLFLD-MAXP algorithms. Among three distance metrics used for computation of label dissimilarity, Hamming distance has shown the most improved performance and hence used for further evaluation. The performance of implemented algorithms is compared with the state-of-the-art MLkNN algorithm. They showed an improvement for some datasets only. This chapter introduces parameters MLE and skew. MLE, skew, along with outlier parameter help to analyze multi-label and imbalanced nature of datasets. Investigation of datasets for various parameters and experimentation explored the need for data preprocessing for removing outliers. It revealed an improvement in the performance of implemented algorithms for all measures, and effectiveness is empirically validated.

Related Content

P. V. Naveen, A. Poongodi. © 2026. 24 pages.
Sathya Selvaraj Sinnasamy, S. Kamaleswari, U. Surendar, Biswaranjan Senapati, B. Vaidianathan, M. Gandhi. © 2026. 14 pages.
B. Aarthi, A. Smruthi, Pamireddy Thanishka, G. Sakthi Prasanna, P. Mahendran. © 2026. 18 pages.
R. Radhika, A. Muthukumaravel. © 2026. 24 pages.
R. Regin, K. Lalith Reddy, R. Sanjay Narayanan, Y. Likhith Srinivas, R. Steffi, S. Saranya, S. R. Saranya. © 2026. 26 pages.
R. Saranya, S. Silvia Priscila. © 2026. 20 pages.
Manjunath Singh H., R. Tanuja. © 2026. 28 pages.
Body Bottom