The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Does an Open Source Development Environment Facilitate Conventional Project Management Approaches and Collaborative Work?
Abstract
Open source software (OSS) is very well known for allowing free access to the source code of the application. The idea is to allow for the creation of a better product. The more people working to make each aspect of an application better, more minds create more ideas, create a better project. OSS runs the internet since all of the protocols—network time protocol (NTP), HTTP, amongst many others—are OSS projects with many years of use. These projects are run by volunteers worldwide. But, none of these projects are run using the traditional methodologies of project management: Waterfall and Agile. This chapter asks: How does an open source development environment facilitate conventional Waterfall project management approaches? and How does an open source development environment facilitate Agile project collaborative work? The method used to determine the answers used surveys and questionnaires involving actual participants in a variety of OSS projects from across the United States (US). The questions asked concerned the organization OSS projects, did they use a particular traditional methodology or some other non-defined method of organization? The answers received by this study centered on non-defined methods of organization; traditional methodologies were considered too restrictive and not agile enough to allow for the freedom cherished by their volunteers.
Related Content
|
Sonal Linda.
© 2024.
24 pages.
|
|
Yasmin Yousaf Mossa, Peter Smith, Kathleen Ann Bland.
© 2024.
40 pages.
|
|
Ugochukwu Okwudili Matthew, Jazuli Sanusi Kazaure, Charles Chukwuebuka Ndukwu, Godwin Nse Ebong, Andrew Chinonso Nwanakwaugwu, Ubochi Chibueze Nwamouh.
© 2024.
29 pages.
|
|
Shruti Jose, Priyakrushna Mohanty.
© 2024.
20 pages.
|
|
Richa Srishti.
© 2024.
15 pages.
|
|
Aleksei Alipichev, Liudmila Nazarova, Yana Chistova.
© 2024.
21 pages.
|
|
Mustafa Öztürk Akcaoğlu, Burcu Karabulut Coşkun.
© 2024.
18 pages.
|
|
|