Do Campaigns “Go Negative” on Twitter?

View Sample PDF

Author(s): Marija Bekafigo (Northern Arizona University, USA)and Allison Clark Ellis (University of South Carolina Upstate, USA)
Copyright: 2017
Pages: 14
Source title: Politics, Protest, and Empowerment in Digital Spaces
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Yasmin Ibrahim (Queen Mary, University of London, UK)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-1862-4.ch011

Keywords: Civic Engagement & Social Justice / Electronic Government / Information Science Reference / Social Sciences & Humanities

Purchase

View Do Campaigns “Go Negative” on Twitter? on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

The use of negative ads in traditional election campaigns has been well-documented, but we know little about the use of Twitter to “go negative.” We content analyze candidate tweets from four different gubernatorial elections in 2011 to understand how candidates are using Twitter. We coded 849 tweets to explain the determinants of “going negative” on Twitter. Our results show that while tweets are overwhelmingly positive, candidates go negative by tweeting about policy. We believe this supports the innovation hypothesis and argue that Twitter is a conducive social media forum for policy-based messages due to its highly partisan nature. However, other determinants of negative campaigning such as competitiveness of the race and campaign funding were consistent with the normalization hypothesis. Our mixed results are consistent with other studies on social media and suggest there is still much to be learned from this tool.

The IRMA Community

Research IRM

Do Campaigns “Go Negative” on Twitter?

Purchase

Abstract

Related Content

IRMA Sponsors